Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1918 Cases
299 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Rice
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. RICE. ERROR to the district court op the united STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT. OF LOUISIANA. No. 574. Submitted April 1, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. Judicial Code, § 24, gives jurisdiction to the
Chicago & Alton Railroad v. United States
CHICAGO & ALTON RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 640. Submitted April 18, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. A switch tender on duty in switch shanties, within a railroad ya
United States v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
UNITED STATES v. CLEVELAND, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 593. Argued March 4, 5, 6, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. A railroad company bought shares of an
Hays v. Gauley Mountain Coal Co.
HAYS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA, v. GAULEY MOUNTAIN COAL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ' FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 327. Argued March 4, 5, 6, 1918 Decided May 20, 1918 The Corpor
Doyle v. Mitchell Bros.
DOYLE, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. MITCHELL BROTHERS COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 492. Argued March 4, 5, 6, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. The purpose of the Corporation Tax Act of Augus
United States v. Ferguson
UNITED STATES v. FERGUSON ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE -CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 238. Submitted May 1, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. For the purpose of determining the quantum of Indian blood possessed by members of the
William E. Peck & Co. v. Lowe
WILLIAM E. PECK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, v. LOWE, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, SECOND DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. EEBOB TO THE DISTBICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 234. Argued December 10, 11, 1917. Dec
Marin v. Augedahl
MARIN, AS RECEIVER OF THE AMERICAN BISCUIT COMPANY OF CROOKSTON, v. AUGEDAHL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, STATE OP NORTH DAKOTA. No. 227. Submitted March 18, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. Refusal of a state court to respect a
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Wisconsin
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. STATE OF WISCONSIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 240. Argued March 22, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. The “license fee,” laid by Wisconsin on domestic “level-premium” l
Goldfield Consolidated Mines Co. v. Scott
GOLDFIELD CONSOLIDATED MINES COMPANY v. SCOTT, AS COLLECTOR OF U. S. INTERNAL REVENUE, FOURTH CALIFORNIA DISTRICT. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 334. Argued March 4, 5, 6, 1918. Decided May 20, 191
United States v. Biwabik Mining Co.
UNITED STATES v. BIWABIK MINING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 594. Argued March 4, 5, 6, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. In computing the excise, under the Corporation Tax Act of August 5, 1909,
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Foster
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY ET AL. v. FOSTER AND MACLEOD ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MASSACHUSETTS. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY ET AL. v. MACLEOD ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE COMM
Carney v. Chapman
CARNEY v. CHAPMAN ET AL. error to the supreme court of the state of OKLAHOMA. No. 281. Argued May 1, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. The construction of .an act of Congress may be involved by implication so as to present a federal question. Evi
Erie Railroad v. Hilt
ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY v. HILT, AN INFANT, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 846. Argued May 3, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. The New Jersey law providing that any person' injured
McGinis v. California
McGINIS ET AL. v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OP IMPERIAL COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 134. Argued April 26, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. In a prosecution for having cocaine in possession in violation o
McGinis v. California
McGINIS ET AL. v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ERROR to the superior court of imperial county, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 133. Argued April 26, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. Upon the question whether opium was in transit through Californi
United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co.
UNITED STATES v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED SPATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ^ No. 207. Argued March 16, 19, 20, 21, 1917; restored to docket for re-argument May
Ex parte Abdu
EX PARTE ABDU ET AL., PETITIONERS. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 31, Original. Argued April 29, 1918. Rule, discharged May 20,1918. In a case ultimately within its reviewing power, this court has jurisdiction to require by mandamus the
York Manufacturing Co. v. Colley
YORK MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. COLLEY ET AL. ERROR to the court of civil appeals, fourth supreme JUDICIAL DISTRICT, OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 200. Argued March 18, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. In an interstate contract for sale of a complica
Ex parte Southwestern Surety Insurance
EX PARTE SOUTHWESTERN SURETY INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONER. PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION. No. 28, Original. Submitted April 22,1918. Rule discharged May 20, 1918. In an action against a contractor and surety under the Act of August 13,
Huller v. New Mexico ex rel. Northwestern Colonization & Improvement Co.
No. 863. Luis Huller et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of New Mexico on the Relation of Northwestern Colonization & Improvement Company of Chihuahua. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico. Motion to dismiss submitted
Gasquet v. Fenner
GASQUET v. FENNER, TESTAMENTARY EXECUTOR, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT .OF LOUISIANA. No. 261. Argued April 24, 1918. Decided May 6, 1918. When the laws of a State provide that final se
Perlman v. United States
PERLMAN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM AND ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 752. Argued April 18, 1918. Decided May 6, 1918. An order of the District Court allowing the District Atto
Cox v. Wood
COX v. WOOD, COMMANDANT OF CAMP FUNSTON, IN THE STATE OF KANSAS. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 833. Argued April 17, 18, 1918. Decided May 6, 1918. Congress may conscript for military du
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.