Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1919 Cases
301 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pulp Wood Co. v. Green Bay Paper & Fibre Co.
No. 910. Pulp Wood Company v. Green Bay Paper & Fibre Company. March 31, 1919. Mr. Moses Hooper for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Ex parte Hannevig
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Christoffer Hannevig et al., Petitioners. Submitted March 17, 1919. Decided March 31, 1919. Mr. Frederic R. Coudert and Mr. Howard Thayer Kingsbury for petitioners.
United States ex rel. Arant v. Lane
UNITED STATES EX REL. ARANT v. LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 441. Argued March 6, 7, 1919. Decided March 31, 1919. Under the Code of the District of Columbia, as on general p
Wise v. United States
WISE, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF STANNARD, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 214. Argued March 11, 1919. Decided March 31, 1919. In a contract for the construction of two government laboratory buildings, it was provided t
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad
UNITED STATES v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 199. Argued January 30, 1919. Decided March 31, 1919. The term “troops of the United States,” as used in land grant acts, and in the agreement of the Unio
Union Oil Co. v. Smith
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA v. SMITH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 8. Submitted November 13, 1918. Decided March 31, 1919. In order to create valid rights or initiate a title as against the United States un
Capitol Transportation Co. v. Cambria Steel Co.
CAPITOL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. CAMBRIA STEEL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 231. Argued March 14, 17, 1919. Decided March 31, 1919. An owner jwho by personal contract has warranted the seaw
Lane v. Darlington
LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. DARLINGTON ET AL., TRUSTEES, ESTATE OF CLAPP. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 219. Argued March 12, 1919. Decided March 31, 1919. An official resurvey of the boundary of
O'Pry v. United States
O’PRY, SOLE SURVIVING DESCENDANT AND SOLE HEIR OF KOUNS, ETC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 216. Argued March 12, 1919. Decided March 31, 1919. The Act of July 2, 1864, c. 225, 13 Stat. 375, § 8, providing f
United States v. Purcell Envelope Co.
UNITED STATES v. PURCELL ENVELOPE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 168. Argued March 10, 1919. Decided March 31, 1919. In answer to an advertisement under Rev. Stats., § 3709, claimant . made the lowest bid for furnishing énvel
Miller v. McClain
MILLER ET AL. v. McCLAIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP KANSAS. No. 19. Submitted November 13, 1918. Decided March 31, 1919. An Indian holding a trust patent under the General Allotment Act of 1887, who leases his allotment wit
Hazelton v. City of Atlanta
No. 295. J. F. Hazelton et al. v. City of Atlanta. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia. March 26, 1919. Mr. James K. Hines for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Walter T. Colquitt and Mr. Samuel D. Hewlett for defendant in error..
Bishop v. Great Lakes Towing Co.
No. 897. James F. Bishop, Administrator, etc., et al. v. Great Lakes Towing Company. March 24, 1919. Mr. Harry W. Standidge for petitioners.. Mr. Harvey D. Goulder, Mr. Thomas H. Garry and Mr. Ralph F. Potter for respondent.
Gold v. Newton
No. 873. Edward E. Gold et al. v. James T. Newton, Commissioner of Patents. March 24, 1919. Mr. William A. Redding and Mr. Arthur C. Fraser for petitioners. No appearance for respondent.
Southern Railway Co. v. Petit
No. 852. Southern Railway Company v. Hugh Petit et al. March 24, 1919. Mr. H. O’B. Cooper arid Mr. Caruthers Ewing for petitioner. Mr. Julian C. Wihon and Mr. Walter P. Armstrong for respondents.
Calhoun v. Massie
No. 849. C. C. Calhoun v. Bland Massie. March 24, 1919. Mr. Charles F. Consaul for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Crescent Milling Co. v. H. N. Strait Manufacturing Co.
Nos. 266 and 267. Crescent Milling Company v. H. N. Strait Manufacturing Company. Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. Argued for plaintiff in error March 21, 1919. Decided March 24, 1919. Mr. Harr
Powers v. Scott County Milling Co.
No. 272. Neely Powers, Trustee, etc., v. Scott County Milling Company. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi. Submitted March 21, 1919. Decided March 24, 1919. Mr. James N. Flowers and Mr. William 11. Watkins for plaintiff
United States v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal
UNITED STATES v. BROOKLYN EASTERN DISTRICT TERMINAL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 155. Argued January 20, 1919. Decided March 24, 1919. Whether a carrier is a common carrier, within the meaning of t
Union Tank Line Co. v. Wright
UNION TANK LINE COMPANY v. WRIGHT, COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF GEORGIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREiME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 170. Argued January 22, 1919. Decided March 24, 1919. A State may tax the movables of a foreign corporation, which a
St. Louis Poster Advertising Co. v. City of St. Louis
ST. LOUIS POSTER ADVERTISING COMPANY v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS ET AL. ST. LOUIS POSTER ADVERTISING COMPANY v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . FOR
Dominion Hotel, Inc. v. Arizona
DOMINION HOTEL, INCORPORATED, v. STATE OF ARIZONA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARIZONA. No. 178. Submitted March 11, 1919. Decided March 24, 1919. Under the equal protection clause, a State may do what it can to prevent what
Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. Manila Electric Railroad & Light Co.
BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS v. MANILA ELECTRIC RAILROAD & LIGHT COMPANY. APPEAL FROM AND ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. - No. 230. Argued March 14, 1919. Decided March 24, 1919. A judgment of the Supreme Cou
Arkansas v. Mississippi
STATE OF ARKANSAS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. IN EQUITY. No, 7, Original. Argued March 3, 4, 1919. Decided March 19,1919. Under Equity Rule 31, a replication held not required in order to put in issue the allegations of the answer. P. 41. .The
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.