Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1921 Cases
257 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gaston, Williams & Wigmore, of Canada, Ltd. v. Warner
No. 840. Gaston, Williams & Wigmore, of Canada, Limited v. Philip A. Warner. April 18, 1921.
Palmer v. King
No. 245. N. W. Palmer et al. v. Racheal King et. al. Error, to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Submitted March 21, 1921. Decided April 18, 1921.
North Dakota v. Minnesota
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA v. STATE OF MINNESOTA. In Equity. No. 14, Original. Argued January 3, 4, 1921. Order entered April 18, 1921. Order restoring the case to the docket, directing the taking of supplemental proofs and suggesting the consol
Frey & Son, Inc. v. Cudahy Packing Co.
FREY & SON, INCORPORATED, v. CUDAHY PACKING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. . No. 200. Argued March 16, 1921. Decided April 18, 1921. 1. When the Circuit Court of Appeals reverses a judgment of the Dis
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States
ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 256. Submitted March 22, 1921. Decided April 18, 1921. 1. In the absence of a previous arrangement with the carrier for reduced rates under §
Privett v. United States
PRIVETT ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE , EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 236. Argued March 18, 1921. Decided April 18, 1921. 1. A homestead allotment of a half-blood Creek Indian, who died intestate leav
Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. Feldman
MARCUS BROWN HOLDING COMPANY, INC., v. FELDMAN ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 731. Argued March 3, 7, 1921. Decided April 18, 1921. 1. In view of the emergency declared
Block v. Hirsh
BLOCK, TRADING UNDER THE NAME OF WHITES, v. HIRSH. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 640. Argued March 3, 1921. Decided April 18, 1921. The Act of October 22“ Í919, c. 80, Title II, 41 Stat. 297, created a commi
New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Fruchter
No. 766. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company v. David Fruchter, an Infant, etc.; and New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company v. Sam Fruchter. No. 767. April 11, 1921.
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Zuber
No. 198. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company et al. v. Hannah L. Zuber. On writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Argued January 28, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921.
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. McGrew Coal Co.
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. McGREW COAL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. No. 265. Argued March 1, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921. 1. The Missouri long-and-short-haul statute is constitutional. P. 135. Miss
Ex parte National Park Bank
EX PARTE IN THE MATTER OF NATIONAL PARK BANK OF NEW YORK, PETITIONER. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 28, Original. Argued March 15, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921. 1. The Circuit Court of Appeals is without power to reopen a case to corre
Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District
MILLER & LUX, INCORPORATED, v. SACRAMENTO & SAN JOAQUIN DRAINAGE DISTRICT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA. No. 347. Argued March 9, 10, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921. That particular lands included in a drainage distri
Bank of Minden v. Clement
BANK OF MINDEN ET AL. v. CLEMENT, ADMINISTRATRIX OF CLEMENT. EEEOE TO THE SUPEEME COUET OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 238. Submitted March 21, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921. 1. A life insurance policy payable to the executors, administrator
Wall v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
WALL, ADMINISTRATRIX OF WALL, v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY. EBBOB TO THE SUPBEME COUBT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 237. Argued March 21, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921. A federal question which could have been raised before but was
Economy Light & Power Co. v. United States
ECONOMY LIGHT & POWER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 104. Argued December 17, 1920. Decided April 11, 1921. _L_Artificial obstructions subject to abatement by public authority
Ownbey v. Morgan
OWNBEY v. MORGAN ET AL., EXECUTORS OF MORGAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. No. 99. Argued November 18, 1920. Decided April 11, 1921. 1. The Delaware rule in foreign attachment cases which conditioned the defendant’s
Oklahoma v. Textas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 23, Original. Argued December 14, 15, 1920. Decided April 11, 1921. Oklahoma brought this suit against Texas to establish the boundary between the two States whe
United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
UNITED STATES v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 325. Argued October 7, 1920. Decided April 11, 1921. 1. The Northern Pacific Railroad Act of July .2, 1864, c. 217, 13 St
Galbraith v. Vallely
GALBRAITH v. VALLELY, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF REISWIG, BANKRUPT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 234. Argued March 18, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921. An assignee for the benefit of creditors turned ove
Minnesota ex rel. Wipple v. Martinson
STATE OF MINNESOTA ON THE RELATION OF WHIPPLE v. MARTINSON, SHERIFF OF HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 224. Argued March 17, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921. 1. Minnesota Laws, 1915, c. 260
American Steel Foundries v. Whitehead
AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIES v. WHITEHEAD, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 131. Argued January 12, 13, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921. Decided on the authority of Baldwin Co. v. Howard
Baldwin Co. v. R. S. Howard Co.
THE BALDWIN COMPANY ET AL. v. R. S. HOWARD COMPANY. THE BALDWIN COMPANY v. R. S. HOWARD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM AND ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIOrIri TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 139 and 113. Argued January 14,
Arkansas v. Mississippi
STATE OF ARKANSAS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. IN EQUITY. No. 6, Original. Motion for confirmation of report of .comjnissioners and suggestions in support of same submitted February 28, 1921. Final decree entered April 11, 1921. Decree reciting
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.