Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1922 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ex parte Wise
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Wise & Felder, Receivers, etc., Petitioners. April 17, 1922. Mr. Charles H. Tuttle and Mr. Saul S. Myers for petitioners.
Texas Co. v. Brown
TEXAS COMPANY v. BROWN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE OF GEORGIA, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 126. Argued October 13, 14, 1921. Decided April 17, 192
United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. United States
UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT- COURT OP THE UNITED.STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP MISSOURI. No. 119. Argued March 7, 8, 9, 1921; restored to docket for reargument June 6, 1921; rearg
United States v. Moreland
UNITED STATES v. MORELAND. CERTIORARI to the court of appeals of the district of COLUMBIA. No. 629. Argued March 9, 10, 1922. Decided April 17, 1922. 1. Imprisonment at hard labor, whether in a penitentiary or elsewhere, is an infamous puni
Ferry v. Corbett
No. 250. Evelyn P. Ferry v. Henry L. Corbett et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 20, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. Mr. Charles Haldane for appellant. Mr. Joseph Simon for appellees. .
Dahn v. Davis
DAHN v. DAVIS, AGENT, ETC. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 166. Argued March 10, 13, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. A postal employee of the United States, injured while in the performance of his duty o
Collins v. McDonald
COLLINS ET AL. v. McDONALD, COMMANDANT OF DISCIPLINARY BARRACKS OF THE UNITED STATES, ALCATRAZ ISLAND, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 150. Su
Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. McGinn
OREGON-WASHINGTON RAILROAD & NAVIGATION COMPANY v. McGINN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.' No. 170. Argued March. 17, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. 1. In the absence of a statute or special contract, the l
Vigliotti v. Pennsylvania
VIGLIOTTI v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 530. Argued March 14, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. The law of Pennsylvania of May 13,1887, known as the Brooks Law, .which prohibits sa
Galveston Electric Co. v. City of Galveston
GALVESTON ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY OF GALVESTON ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 455. Argued December 15, 16, 1921. Decided April 10, 1922. 1. The fact that a public utility,
Greiner v. Lewellyn
GREINER, EXECUTRIX OF KINGSLEY, v. LEWELLYN, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE'WESTERN DISTRICT OP PENNSYLVANIA No. 187. Argued March 22, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. In imposing 'a tax
Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
LAMBERT RUN COAL COMPANY v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ' FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 153. Argued March 6, 7, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. 1. A suit by a shipper to enjoin' a railroad company
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 147. Argued March 3, 6, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. The obligation of a land-grant-aided railroad to transport at reduced rates “ troops ” of t
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. C. C. Whitnack Produce Co.
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. C. C. WHITNACK PRODUCE COMPANY. certiorari' to the supreme court of the state of ' NEBRASKA. ' No. 146. Argued March 3, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. 1. When goods moving in interstate commerce upon
Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.
EXPORTERS OF MANUFACTURERS' PRODUCTS, INC. v. BUTTERWORTH-JUDSON COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.', No. 390. Argued March 14, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. After expiration, of the term’of the D
First National Bank v. Adams
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF GULFPORT, MISSISSIPPI, v. ADAMS, REVENUE AGENT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 136. Argued March 2, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. 1. A state tax upon a nat
Essanay Film Manufacturing Co. v. Kane
ESSANAY FILM MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. KANE. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 70. Submitted November 10, 1921. Decided April 10, 1922. A' suit in the District Court to enjoin the defendant from further pros
Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-Houston Co.
STANDARD FASHION COMPANY v. MAGRANE-HOUSTON COMPANY. CEBTIOBABI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 20. Argued January 25, 1921; restored to docket for reargument April 11, 1921; reargued January. 16, 1922. Decided Ap
White Oak Transportation Co. v. Boston, Cape Cod & New York Canal Co.
WHITE OAK TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. BOSTON, CAPE COD & NEW YORK CANAL COMPANY. NORTHERN COAL COMPANY v. BOSTON, CAPE COD & NEW YORK CANAL COMPANY. certiorari to the circuit court' of appeals for the FIRST CIRCUIT. Nos. 116, 124. Argued Marc
Forbes Pioneer Boat Line v. Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District
FORBES PIONEER BOAT LINE v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF EVERGLADES DRAINAGE DISTRICT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. No. 188. Argued March 23, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. 1. Plaintiff, having been required by the defend
Bankers Trust Co. v. City of Raton
BANKERS TRUST COMPANY v. CITY OF RATON AND RATON WATER WORKS COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. No. 167. Argued March 16, 17, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. 1. Where there were two st
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.
UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 127. Argued March 16, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. 1. A contract of the United States to pay for its use of a patented invention js to be implied rather than a
Ferry v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.
FERRY v. SPOKANE, PORTLAND & SEATTLE RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT- OF APPEALS FOR' THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 177. Argued March 20, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. 1. Dower is not a privilege or immunity of citizenship,'st
Balzac v. Porto Rico
BALZAC v. PEOPLE OF PORTO RICO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP PORTO RICO. Nos. 178, 179. Argued March 20, 1922. Decided April 10, 1922. 1. The Act of January 28, 1915, c. 22, 38 Stat. 803, amending § 246 of the Judicial Code, and providing
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.