Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1922 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
John Simmons Co. v. Grier Bros.
No. 57. John Simmons Company v. Grier Brothers Company. Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Submitted May 15, 1922. Motion to modify decree denied May 29, 1922. Mr. James Q. Rice for petitioner. Mr. C. P. Byrne
United States ex rel. Creary v. Weeks
UNITED STATES EX REL. CREARY v. WEEKS, SECRETARY OF WAR. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 725. Argued April 20, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. 1. French v. Weeks, ante, 326, followed, to the effect that § 24b of t
United States ex rel. French v. Weeks
UNITED STATES EX REL. FRENCH v. WEEKS, SECRETARY OF WAR. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS - OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 724. Argued April 20, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. 1. The Army Reorganization Act of June 4, 1920, c. 227, § 24b, 41 St
City of Houston v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
CITY OF HOUSTON v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY v. CITY OF HOUSTON. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Nos. 219, 220. Argued April 24, 25, 192
Collins v. Loisel
COLLINS v. LOISEL, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 672. Argued April 28, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. 1. To warrant e
Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. United States
FIDELITY TITLE & TRUST COMPANY, PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 208. Argued April 21, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. 1. The limitation on actions in the Court of Claims on claims arising under t
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. United States
FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 207. Argued April 21, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. 1. In fixing special bankers’ taxes under the Act of June 13, 1898, c. 448,' § 2, 30 Stat. 448,
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. MERCHANTS ELEVATOR COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 202. Argued April 18, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. When, in an action by a shipper to recover charges exacted
Ng Fung Ho v. White
NG FUNG HO, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS UNG KIP, ET AL. v. WHITE, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION FOR THE PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 176. Argued March 17, 20, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922.
State Industrial Commission v. Nordenholt Corp.
STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. NORDENHOLT CORPORATION ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME. COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 625. Argued March 9, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. 1. When an employee, while working on boar
Olin v. Kitzmiller
OLIN v. KITZMILLER ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 246. Argued April 21, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. The compact between Washington and Oregon, approved by Congress April 8, 1918-, agreeing that al
Carlisle Packing Co. v. Sandanger
CARLISLE PACKING COMPANY v. SANDANGER. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WASHINGTON. No. 195. Argued March 24, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. 1. According to the general maritime law, a seaman injured in the service of the ship o
Miles v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
MILES, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, v. SAFE DEPOSIT & TRUST COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, GUARDIAN OF BROWN. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT .COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. No. 416. Argued December 16,
United States v. Southern Pacific Co.
UNITED STATES v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH. No. 5. Argued April 18, 19, 20, 1921; restored to docket for reargument January 9, 1922; reargued April 11, 12, 1
Mutual Life Insurance v. Liebing
MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. LIEBING. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 215. Argued April 21, 24, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. 1. A law of the State where a' life insurance policy was executed, directin
Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs
FEDERAL BASEBALL CLUB OF BALTIMORE, INC. v. NATIONAL LEAGUE OF PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL CLUBS, ET AL. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 204. Argued April 19, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. 1. The business of providing
Santa Fe Pacific Railroad v. Fall
SANTA FE PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. FALL, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 108, 109. Argued January 24, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. The Act of April 28, 1904, ,c. 1810, § 1, 33
Pine Hill Coal Co. v. United States
PINE HILL COAL COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 101. Argued January 20, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. 1. Section 25 of the “ Lever Act ” of August 10, 1917, c. 53, 40 Stat. 284, authorized the fixing of all
Morrisdale Coal Co. v. United States
MORRISDALE COAL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 65. Argued January 6, 9, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. Pursuant to regulations made under the “ Lever Act ” of August 10, 1917, c. 53, § 25, 40 Stat. 284, which au
Industrial Accident Commission v. Davis
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. DAVIS, AS AGENT, &c. (LOS ANGELES & SALT LAKE RAILWAY COMPANY). CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, OF THE STATE OF CALIFOR
Continental Insurance v. United States
CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES, READING COMPANY, ET AL. PROSSER ET AL., AS A COMMITTEE REPRESENTING HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK OF THE READING COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, READING COMPANY, ET AL. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT C
Alabama Power Co. v. Talmadge
No. 741. Alabama Power Company et al. v. Banks S. Talmadge, as Administrator, etc. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted April 24, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. Mr. William L. Martin and Mr.
Rainier Brewing Co. v. Great Northern Pacific Steamship Co.
RAINIER BREWING COMPANY v. GREAT NORTHERN PACIFIC STEAMSHIP COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 267. Argued April 21, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. 1. Under Criminal Code, § 240, and the Webb-Kenyon Act,
Kendall v. Ewert
KENDALL, ADMINISTRATOR OF REDEAGLE, ET AL. v. EWERT. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 157. Argued March 13, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. 1. A deed made by an Indian to one who took it as agent for another
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.