Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1922 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Western Machinery Co. v. Richfield Oil Co.
No. 427. Western Machinery Company et al. v. Richfield Oil Company. October 9, 1922. Mr. Nathan Newby for petitioners. Mr. Troy Pace for respondent
Reinstein v. United States
No. 405. Morris Reinstein et al. v. United States. October 9, 1922. Mr. Elijah-N. Zoline for petitioners. Mr. Solicitor General Beck and Mr. William C. Herron for the United States. ”
McIntosh v. Dill
No. 386. Mildred McIntosh v. W. H. Dill et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. October 9, 1922. Mr. Thomas H. Owen and Mr. George C. Crump, for plaintiff in error, in support of the petition. Mr. Nathan A. Gibson and Mr
American Railway Express Co. v. Levee
No. 424. American Railway Express Company v. Lucius P. Levee. October 9, 1922. Mr. Hunter C. Leake, Mr. -A. M. Hartimg and Mr. H. Garland Dupré for petitioner; Mr. Charles T. Wortham, for respondent.
In re Bacon Bros.
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the matter of Bacon Brothers Company, Petitioner. Submitted October 3, 1922. Decided October 9, 1922. M-r. George D. Welles for petitioner.
Peoples Development Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.
No. 304. Peoples Development Company v. Southern Pacific Company et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion to affirm submitted October 3, 1922. Decided October 9, 1922. Mr. T. C. West and Mr. H. A. Powell
Trustees of United States-Mexico Oil Co. v. Harris
No. 323. Trustees of the United States-Mexico Oil Company v. T. W. Harris. Error to the' Supreme. Court of the State of Kansas.- Motion to dismiss submitted October 3, 1922. Decided October 9, 1922. Mr. William ‘W. Fry for plaintiffs in err
Gettys v. Newburger
No. 183. Seth Gettys et al., etc., v. Silvan Newburger et al. Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 3, 1922. Decided October 9, 1922. Mr. W. A. Ledbetter,- Mr. H. L. Stua
Wyoming v. Colorado
STATE OF WYOMING v. STATE OF COLORADO ET AL. IN EQUITY. No. 3, Original.. October Term, 1921. Petition for rehearing denied. Modified final decree entered October 9, 1922. The original decree, herein modified, is reported in 259 U. S., at p
Eddy v. First National Bank of Fargo
No. 211. E. C. Eddy, as Treasurer, etc., et al. v. First National Bank of Fargo. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. October 3, 1922. Mr. Geo. E. Wallace and Mr. C. L. Young for appellants. Mr. John F. Callahan
Stevens v. Southern Pacific Land Co.
No. 401. No. 402. No. 403. Buell V. Stevens v. Southern Pacific Land Company; Ralph E. Stevens, Administrator, etc. v. Southern Pacific Land Company; and Mary V. Beggs v. Southern Pacific Land Company. Error to the District Court of Appeal,
Georgia v. South Carolina
STATE OF GEORGIA v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. In Equity. No. 16, Original. Form of decree submitted May 15, 1922. Decree entered June 5, 1922. Decree declaring location of interstate boundary.
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. In Equity. No. 20, Original. Partial decree entered June 5, 1922. Red River is not a navigable stream in Oklahoma; the State acquired no title to the part of the river bed with
Lipke v. Lederer
LIPKE v. LEDERER, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 596. Argued March 21, 22, 1922. Decided June 5, 1922.
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Perry
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. PERRY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA.' No. 19. Argued April 20, 1921; restored to docket for reargument June 6, 1921; reargued October 6, 1921. Decided June 5, 1922. 1.
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Cheek
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. CHEEK. ERROR TO THE ST. LOUIS COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 149. Argued March 6, 1922. Decided June 5, 1922. 1. The Service Letter Law of Missouri, requiring every corporation doing busi
Ward & Gow v. Krinsky
WARD & GOW v. KRINSKY ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 343. Argued December 14, 1921. Decided June 5, 1922. 1. The rights of employers under the Fourteenth Amend
Weiland v. Pioneer Irrigation Co.
WEILAND, STATE ENGINEER OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, ET AL. v. PIONEER IRRIGATION COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 3. Argued January 17, 1919; restored to docket for reargument June 6, 1921; reargue
Wyoming v. Colorado
STATE OF WYOMING v. STATE OF COLORADO ET AL. IN EQUITY. No. 3, Original. Final decree entered June 5, 1922.
Wyoming v. Colorado
STATE OF WYOMING v. STATE OF COLORADO ET AL. IN EQUITY. No. 3, Original. Argued December 6, 7, 8, 1916; restored to docket for reargument March 6, 1917; reargued January 9, 10, 11, 1918; restored to docket for reargument June 6, 1921; rearg
Ex parte Harley-Davidson Motor Co.
EX PARTE IN THE MATTER OF HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY ET AL., PETITIONERS. PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 26, Original. Motion for judgment notwithstanding rule to show cause. Submitted April 24, 1922. Decided June 5, 1922. 1. The g
United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA ET AL. v. CORONADO COAL COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH ' CIRCUIT. No. 31. Argued October 15, 1920; restored to docket for reargument January 3, 1922; reargued March 22, 23,
Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co.
No. 891. Toledo Scale Company v. Computing Scale Company. May 29, 1922. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted. Mr. George D. Welles and Mr. Horace Kent Tenney for petitioner. Mr. J
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
No. 634. No. 785. Dora E. Rooker et al. v. Fidelity Trust Company et al., etc.; and Dora E. Rooker et al. v. Fidelity Trust Company et al., etc. Petition for a writ of certiorari and error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana. May 2
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.