Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1922 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ewert v. Bluejacket
EWERT v. BLUEJACKET, A WIDOW, ET AL. BLUEJACKET, A WIDOW, ET AL. v. EWERT. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 173, 186. Argued March 17, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. 1. An attorney at law who is employed a
Pierce Oil Corp. v. Phoenix Refining Co.
PIERCE OIL CORPORATION ET AL. v. PHOENIX REFINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 172. Argued March 17, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. Action of a State requiring a foreign corporation, to operate its local, p
Heald v. District of Columbia
HEALD, EXECUTOR OF PETERS, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 268. Argued April 13, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. 1. The objections that the act of Congress taxing the intangible property o
Union Tool Co. v. Wilson
UNION TOOL COMPANY v. WILSON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 132. Argued March 1, 2, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. 1. Upon an application of the plaintiff in a pending suit charging the defendant with se
Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co.
NEWTON, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. v. CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY OF NEW YORK. SAME v. NEW YORK & QUEENS GAS COMPANY. SAME v. CENTRAL UNION GAS COMPANY. SAME v. NORTHERN UNION GAS COMPANY. SAME v. NEW YORK MUTUAL GAS
South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. City of Newport
SOUTH COVINGTON & CINCINNATI STREET RAILWAY COMPANY, ET AL. v. CITY OF NEWPORT, KENTUCKY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 203. Argued April 13, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922, Thé bi
Grogan v. Hiram Walker & Sons, Ltd.
GROGAN, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, ET AL. v. HIRAM WALKER & SONS, LTD. ANCHOR LINE (HENDERSON BROTHERS), LTD. v. ALDRIDGE, COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS FOR THE PORT OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
American Smelting & Refining Co. v. United States
AMERICAN SMELTING AND REFINING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 221. Argued April 25, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. 1. A contract made during war for war material to be delivered by a specified date, which was as
Hill v. Wallace
HILL, JR., ET AL. v. WALLACE, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL. APPEAL FEOM THE DISTEICT COUET OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE NOETHEEN DISTEICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 616. Argued January 11, 12, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. 1. Members of an incorpora
Child Labor Tax Case
CHILD LABOR TAX CASE. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 657. Argued March 7, 8, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. act of Congress which clearly, on its face, is designed to penalize,
Bailey v. George
BAILEY, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL. v. GEORGE, TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS AS VIVIAN COTTON MILLS, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 590. Argued March 7, 8, 1
Atherton Mills v. Johnston
ATHERTON MILLS v. JOHNSTON ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATEÍ3 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 16. Argued December 10, 1919; restored to docket for reargument June 6, 1921; reargued March 7, 8, 1922.
British Columbia Mills Tug & Barge Co. v. Mylroie
BRITISH COLUMBIA MILLS TUG & BARGE COMPANY v. MYLROIE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE . NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 190. Argued March 23, 24, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. 1. A vessel, off her course on a dark and stormy night in t
Payne v. Industrial Board
No. 222. John Barton Payne, Agent, etc., et al. v. Industrial Board of Illinois et al. Error to the Circuit Court of Coles County, State of Illinois. Argued April 25,1922. Decided May 1, 1922. Mr. George B. Gillespie, Mr. H. N. Quigley, Mr.
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 20, Original. Argued December 13, 14, 1921. Decided May 1, 1922. 1. When this court, in ap. original suit involving title to land claimed by two States against e
Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
SLOAN SHIPYARDS CORPORATION ET AL. v. UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION AND THE UNITED STATES. ASTORIA MARINE IRON WORKS v. UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION. UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGE
Knox v. McElligott
KNOX, SURVIVING EXECUTOR OF KISSAM, ET AL. v. McELLIGOTT, LATE COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 602. Argued April 18, 1922. Decided May 1, 19
Levy v. Wardell
LEVY ET AL. v. WARDELL, UNITED STATES COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ERROR to THE DISTRICT court of the united states for THE NORTHERN DISTRICT 01*" CALIFORNIA. No. 303. Argued April 18, 1922. Dec
Union Trust Co. v. Wardell
UNION TRUST COMPANY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL., AS EXECUTORS OF LACHMAN, v. WARDELL, UNITED STATES COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DIS
Shwab v. Doyle
SHWAB, EXECUTOR OF DICKEL, v. DOYLE, UNITED STATES COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE FOURTH COLLECTION DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 200. Argued April 17, 1922. Decided May 1, 192
Stafford v. Wallace
STAFFORD ET AL., COPARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS AS STAFFORD BROTHERS, ET AL. v. WALLACE, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL. BURTON ET AL. v. CLYNE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT C
Doe v. City of Rochester
'No. —, Original. John Doe, Demise of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, v. City of Rochester; and Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Eugene Van Voorhis et al., Commissioners of Appraisal. No. —, Original. Argued April 24, 1922. Decided April
Ex parte Bergdoll
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Erwin R. Bergdoll, Petitioner. April 24, 1922. Mr. Joseph D. Shewalter for petitioner.
Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. WINSTED HOSIERY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 333. Argued March 13, 14, 1922. Decided April 24, 1922. 1. Findings of fact made by the Federal Trade Commission are
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.