Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1923 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Omnia Commercial Co. v. United States
OMNIA COMMERCIAL COMPANY, INC., v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 229. Argued March 1, 1923. Decided April 9, 1923. 1. A valuable contract right is property within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment, and when taken for
Pusey & Jones Co. v. Hanssen
THE PUSEY & JONES COMPANY v. HANSSEN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 431. Argued February 27, 1923. Decided April 9, 1923. 1. In the absence of a statute, a suit for a receiver of an insolvent corporat
Robinson v. United States
ROBINSON, ADMINISTRATOR OF ROBINSON, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 335. Argued March 16, 1923. Decided April 9, 1923. 1. Stipulations in construction contracts obliging the contractor to pay liquidated damages for e
Thomas v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
THOMAS, SHERIFF AND COLLECTOR, ET AL. v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 303. Argued March 9, 12, 1923. Decided April 9, 1923. 1. The legislature of a State ma
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Kierejewski
GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK COMPANY v. KIEREJEWSKI, ADMINISTRATRIX OF KIEREJEWSKI. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 633. Argued February 27, 1923. Decided April 9, 1923. The District C
Hartford Life Insurance v. Douds
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. DOUDS ET AL., EXECUTORS OF DOUDS. HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. LANGDALE. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OHIO. Nos. 265 and 271. Argued March 7, 1923. Decided April 9, 1923. 1. The la
Federal Trade Commission v. Sinclair Refining Co.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY (NEW JERSEY). FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. GULF REFINING COMPANY. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. MALONEY OIL & MANUFACTURING COMPANY. CERTIO
Wabash Railway Co. v. Elliott
WABASH RAILWAY COMPANY v. ELLIOTT. CERTIORARI TO THE KANSAS CITY COURT OF APPEALS, STATE • OF MISSOURI. No. 225. Argued January 16, 1923. Decided April 9, 1923. Where a'claim for personal injuries occasioned by the operation of a railroad w
Gardner v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.
GARDNER, AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF O’GARA COAL COMPANY, v. CHICAGO TITLE & TRUST COMPANY, AS RECEIVER OF LA SALLE STREET TRUST & SAVINGS BANK. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE " SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 317. Argued March 15,
Phipps v. Cleveland Refining Co.
PHIPPS AND PHIPPS, AS DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE OF THE STATE OF OHIO, v. CLEVELAND REFINING COMPANY OF CLEVELAND, OHIO. APPEAL FROM ,THE DISTRICT. COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ' FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 324. Argued
Page Co. v. Macdonald
THE PAGE COMPANY v. MACDONALD, &c., A RESIDENT OF THE PROVINCE OF OTTAWA IN THE DOMINION OF CANADA, &c. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 308. Argued March 13, 1923. Decided April 9, 192
Keller v. Potomac Electric Power Co.
KELLER ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 260. Argued February 26, 27, 1923. Decided A
Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co.
TOLEDO SCALE COMPANY v. COMPUTING SCALE COMPANY. FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND ET AL. v. COMPUTING SCALE COMPANY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 339 and 388. Argued March 16, 1923. De
Hallanan v. United Fuel Gas Co.
HALLANAN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, ET AL. v. UNITED FUEL GAS COMPANY. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF. APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WEST ' VIRGINIA. . ' ■ ' Nos. 570 and 886. Motion to dismiss or affirm s
Hallanan v. Eureka Pipe Line Co.
HALLANAN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, ET AL. v. EUREKA PIPE LINE COMPANY. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. Nos. 569 and 885. Motion to dismiss or affirm, etc., subm
Layne & Bowler Corp. v. Western Well Works, Inc.
LAYNE & BOWLER CORPORATION v. WESTERN WELL WORKS, INC., ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 278. Argued March 5, 1923. Decided April 9, 1923. A writ of certiorari, issued to settle a supposed conflic
Partridge v. Crosbie
No. 410. Mary Partridge v. J. E. Crosbie et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. March 19, 1923. Mr. Burt E. Barlow and Mr. Henry B. Martin for plaintiff in error. Mr. A. A. Davidson and Mr. Preston C. West for defendant
Partridge v. Crosbie
No. 410. Mary Partridge v. J. E. Crosbie et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. March 19, 1923. Mr. Burt E. Barlow and Mr. Henry B. Martin for plaintiff in error. Mr. A. A. Davidson and Mr. Preston C. West for defendant
Liberty National Bank v. Bear
No. 889. Liberty National Bank of Roanoke, Virginia, v. James A. Bear, Trustee, etc. March 19, 1923. Mr. James D. Johnston for petitioner. Mr. G. A. Wingfield for respondent.
Huey v. Brock
No. 327. Virginia Huey et al. v. D. A. Brock et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama. Argued March 15, 16, 1923. Decided March 19, 1923. Mr. George H. Lamar, with whom Mr. Theodore J. Lamar was on the brief, for plaintiffs
Jay Burns Baking Co. v. Mckelvie
No. 522. Jay Burns Baking Company et al. v. Samuel R. McKelvie, as Governor of the State of Nebraska, et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska. Submitted March 12, 1923. Order entered March 19, 1923. Mr. Matthew A. Hall an
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 208. Argued March 7, 1923. Decided March 19, 1923. 1. To permit a recovery under the “ Dent Act ”, c. 94, 40 Stat. 1272, there must have been an agreem
Arkansas Natural Gas Co. v. Arkansas Railroad Commission
ARKANSAS NATURAL GAS COMPANY v. ARKANSAS RAILROAD COMMISSION ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 500. Argued February 21, 1923. Decided March 19, 1923. 1. The power of a State
Federal Land Bank v. Crosland
FEDERAL LAND BANK OF NEW ORLEANS v. CROSLAND, JUDGE OF PROBATE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OP ALABAMA. No. 428. Argued March 7, 1923. Decided March 19, 1923. 1. A first mortgage executed tó a Federal Land Bank is an instrumenta
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.