Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1923 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Public Service Commission
ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 284. Argued March 1, 1923. Decided March 19, 1923. An order of a state commission
United States v. Rider
UNITED STATES v. RIDER. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 510. Argued February 23, 1923. Decided March 19, 1923. 1: The Act ,ef June 15, 1917, c. 29, 40 .Stat. 188, in making a deficiency ..appropriation for “ pay at $100 per month for e
Work v. United States ex rel. Mosier
WORK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. UNITED STATES EX REL. MOSIER ET AL. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 25. Argued April 20, 1922; restored to docket for reargument May 29, 1922; reargued February 27, 28, 1923
Lesueur v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.
No. 849. Nathaniel P. Lesueur et al., etc., v. Manufacturers’ Finance Company. March 12, 1923. Mr. James S. Pilcher for petitioners. Mr. John J. Vertrees for respondent.
Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan
No. 764. Tidal Oil Company et al. v. J. P. Flanagan. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. March 12, 1923. Mr. Preston C. West, Mr. A. A. Davidson, Mr. Wallace C. Franklin and Mr. Arthur J. Biddison, for plaintiffs in error,
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 18, Original: SUPPLEMENT TO PARTIAL DECREE' OF JUNE 5, 1922, ENTERED MARCH 12, 1923. Supplemental decree relating to certain lands in the bed of Red River and bo
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 18, Original. PARTIAL DECREE RELATING- TO STATE BOUNDARY, ENTERED MARCH 12, 1923. Decree declaring the general course of and rules for locating the boundary betw
Pullman Co. v. Richardson
PULLMAN COMPANY v. RICHARDSON, AS TREASURER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. HINES, AS DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, ET AL. v. RICHARDSON, AS TREASURER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA. Nos. 143-
Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles
FOX FILM CORPORATION v. KNOWLES ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 310, 311. Argued February 27, 1923. Decided March 12, 1923. 1. Under § 24 of the Copyright Act of 1909, which allows renewals of
Ewen v. American Fidelity Co.
EWEN v. AMERICAN FIDELITY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.- No. 92. Argued March 1, 1923. Decided March 12, 1923. A surety company organized under Illinois Rev. Stats., 1917, c. 32, § 102f, et seq.
United States v. Moran
UNITED STATES v. MORAN. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 231. Argued March 1, 1923. Decided March 12, 1923. Decided on the authority of United States v. Allen, ante, 317. 56 Ct. Chns. 492-, affirmed. Appeal from a judgment of'the" Court
United States v. Allen
UNITED STATES v. ALLEN. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OE CLAIMS. No. 232. Argued March 1, 1923. Decided March 12, 1923. Under the Act of May 22, 1917, c. 20, 40 Stat. 84, providing that, during the War, warrant and petty officers and enlisted men o
City of New York v. New York Telephone Co.
CITY OF NEW YORK v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 588. Argued February 21, 23, 1923. Decided March 12, 1923. 1. In a suit to enjoin enforcement of
Pothier v. Rodman
POTHIER v. RODMAN, UNITED STATES MARSHAL, ET AL. APPEAL PROM AN ORDER OP THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP RHODE ISLAND, DISMISSING A PETITION POR WRIT OP HABEAS CORPUS. No. -. Motion for leave to docket case and p
Fletcher v. Coomes
No. 830. Edmond C. Fletcher v. Isaiah S. Coomes et al. March 5, 1923. Mr. .Camden R. McAtee for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
Cochran v. Becker
No. 498. James K. Cochran et al. v. Coulton M. Becker. Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted February 26, 1923. Decided March 5, 1923. Mr. Harris Kobey, pro se. Mr. Oliver J. Mil
Oklahoma v. Texas
No. 18, Original. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas. Leave to file stipulation and petition in intervention submitted February 26, 1923. Order entered March 5, 1923. Mr. Henry E. Asp for interveners. Mr. W. W. Dyar, Special Assistant to t
Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United States
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 407. Argued January 23, 1923. Decided March 5, 1923. 1. In an action against the United States under § 10 of the Le
United States v. Benedict
UNITED STATES AND CITY OF NEW YORK v. BENEDICT, SOLE SURVIVING TRUSTEE OF LANGLEY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 394. Argued January 23, 1923. Decided March 5, 1923. 1. In an action to recover money from
Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Russell
OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS COMPANY v. RUSSELL ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ET AL. OKLAHOMA GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY ET AL. v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ET AL. APPEALS PROM THE DIST
Andrews v. United States
No. 253. M. Frank Andrews v. United States. Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of South Carolina. February 26, 1923. Mr. Hugh H. Obear, Mr. Charles A. Douglas, Mr. Richard A. Ford and Mr. H. C. Miller
National Bank of Commerce v. Francis
No. 850. National Bank of Commerce of St. Louis v. David R. Francis et al. February 26, 1923. Mr. George L, Edwards, Jr., and Mr. Edward J. White for petitioner. Mr. P. Taylor Bryan, Mr. Sam B. Jeffries and Mr. Thomas Bond for. respondents.
Kern v. Payne
No. 836. Lottie I. Kern, Administratrix, etc., v. John Barton Payne, Director General, etc. February 26, 1923. Mr. Frederick M. Miner for petitioner. Mr. H. H. Field for respondent.
Director General of Railroads v. Keenan
No. 813. Director General of Railroads v. Thomas Keenan. February 26, 1923. Mr. Daniel M. Beach for petitioner. Mr. Joseph A. Wechter for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.