Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1923 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Mossel
UNITED STATES v. MOSSEL. UNITED STATES v. MILFORD. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Nos. 372, 373. Submitted April 10, 1923. Decided April 23, 1923. Decided, pursuant to stipulation, in accordance with United States v. Luskey, ante, 62. 56
Ahrenfeldt v. Miller
AHRENFELDT v. MILLER, AS ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 576. Argued April 13, 1923. Decided April 23, 1923. Decided upon the authority of Commercial Trust Co. v. Miller, ante, 5
United States Trust Co. v. Miller
UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, ANCILLARY ADMINISTRATOR OF WESCHE, v. MILLER, AS ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP NEW JERSEY. No. 292. Argued April 13, 1923. Decided
Commercial Trust Co. v. Miller
COMMERCIAL TRUST COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY v. MILLER, AS ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 575. Argued April 13, 1923. Decided April 23, 1923. 1. A proceeding for the seizure of enemy-
Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Railroad Commission
No. 384. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company v. Railroad Commission of Georgia et al. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia. April 18, 1923. Mr. Sanders McDaniel for appellant. Mr.
Magnum Import Co. v. de Spoturno Coty
No. 978. No. 979. No. 980. No. 981. No. 982. Magnum Import Company, Inc. v. Francois Joseph de Spoturno Coty; Max L. Cohn, trading as Maclen Import Company, v. Francois Joseph de Spoturno Coty; Arthur Baum et al., trading as Beautex Company
Cleveland v. Mattingly
No. 914. Orlando Lee Cleveland v. Robert Mattingly, Judge, etc. April 16, 1923. Mr. T. Morris Wampler for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of Seattle
No. 905. Puget Sound Power & Light Company v. City of Seattle et al. April 16, 1923. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr. James B. Howe for petitioner. Mr. Walter B. Beals and Mr. Robert H. Evans for respondents.
Stager v. United States
No. 370. Charles I. Stager v. United States. Appeal from the Court of Claims. Submitted April 9, 1923. Decided April 16, 1923. Mr. Edwin R. Wakefield for appellant. Mr. Solicitor General Beck and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Lovett for th
Lehigh & Hudson River Railway Co. v. Otterstedt
No. 805. Lehigh & Hudson River Railway Company v. Florence M. Otterstedt, on behalf of herself and minor children. April 16, 1923. Petition for a rehearing herein granted. Mr. John J. Beattie for petitioner. Mr. E. Clarence Aiken for respon
United States v. Luskey
UNITED STATES v. LUSKEY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 371. Argued April 10, 1923. Decided April 16, 1923. The additional pay provided by the Act of March 3, 1915, c. 83, 38 Stat. 928, for enlisted men in the Navy and Marine Corps “
Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.
PRENDERGAST ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 542. Argued Februa
Board of Trade of Chicago v. Olsen
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL. v. OLSEN, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 701. Argued February
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Watts
No. 684. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. A. D. Watts, etc., Commissioner of Revenue, etc., et al. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina. April 9, 1923. Mr. Thomas W. Davis for
Freiberg Mahogany Co. v. Batesville Lumber & Veneer Co.
No. 891. Freiberg Mahogany Company v. Batesville Lumber & Veneer Company. April 9, 1923. Mr. Murray Scasongood for petitioner. Mr. Judson Harmon and Mr. George Hoadly for respondent.
Sherry v. Lucas
No. 843. Dean Sherry, Trustee, etc., et al. v. J. B. Lucas. April 9, 1923. Mr. J. J. Butts for petitioners. No appearance for respondent.
United States v. Mason & Hanger Co.
No. 121. United States v. Mason & Hanger Company; and United States v. Northeastern Construction Company. No. 122. Appeals from the Court of Claims. Re-argued March 2, 5, 1923. Decided April 9, 1923. Mr. Ralph E. Moody, Special Assistant to
Hodges v. Snyder
HODGES ET AL. v. SNYDER ET AL., AS MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE ERWIN INDEPENDENT CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, OF KINGSBURY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA, ET AL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE KINGSBURY COUNTY, NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCU
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OE CLAIMS. No. 305. Argued March 12, 1923. Decided April 9, 1923. 1. The Dent Act, c. 94, 40 Stat. 1272, was intended to remedy irregularities and informalities in th
People ex rel. Doyle v. Atwell
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. DOYLE ET AL. v. ATWELL, ACTING CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF MOUNT VERNON, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK'. No. 306. Submitted March 12, 1923. Decided April 9, 1923. This
Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. United States
ALBERT HANSON LUMBER COMPANY, LTD., v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 300. Argued February 28, March 1, 1923. Decided April 9, 1923. 1. Authority from Congress to condemn a particular canal f
Watkins v. Sedberry
WATKINS, TRUSTEE, ET AL. v. SEDBERRY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 248. Argued January 19, 1923. Decided April 9, 1923. 1. The amount of attorney’s fees to be charged against a bankrupt estate
Adkins v. Children's Hospital of Columbia
ADKINS ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE MINIMUM WAGE BOARD OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, v. CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. SAME v. LYONS. APPEALS PROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 795, 796. Argued March 14
Russell Motor Car Co. v. United States
RUSSELL MOTOR CAR COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. FREYGANG ET AL., PARTNERS DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME OF MIDLAND BRIDGE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ALBERT & J. M. ANDERSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.