Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1925 Cases
289 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Kaufman
UNITED STATES AND BOWERS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. KAUFMAN, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF FINKELSTEIN, ET AL. UNITED STATES AND BOWERS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. COXE, RECEIVER OF JONES AND BAKER, BANKRUPTS. CERTIORARI TO THE CI
Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Stroud
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. STROUD. CERTIORARI' TO THE SPRINGFIELD COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 168. Argued January 14, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. Where a carrier lia? two routes by which freight may move betwee
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. United States
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 83. Argued December 4, 1924. Decided March 2, 1925. A railroad company which made out and presented freight bills to- . the Government for
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 29. Argued December 4, 1924 Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Contracts for sale and delivery of coal to the United States, construed, with the advertise
United States v. Butterworth-Judson Corp.
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. BUTTERWORTH-JUDSON CORPORATION ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT QOURT OP APPEALS POR THE. SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 338. Argued December 9, 10, 1924. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Under the Act of October 6, 1917, § 5, c. 79, 40
City of Newark v. Central Railroad
CITY OF NEWARK, ET AL. v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 351. Argued November 21, 24, 1924. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. New Jersey, by empowering a railroad c
Blundell v. Wallace
BLUNDELL, EXECUTOR, ET AL. v. WALLACE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 276. Argued January 29, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Section 23 of the Act ’of April 26, 1906, disposing of the affairs of the Five Civilized
Lynch v. Alworth-Stephens Co.
LYNCH, EXECUTRIX, ETC. v. ALWORTH-STEPHENS COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 273. Argued January 7, 8, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. The interest of a corporate lessee of a mine under a lease
Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
OHIO UTILITIES COMPANY v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE'STATE OR. OHIO. No. 210. Argued January 20, 21, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. In determining the reproduction value of the plant of a public
Grayson v. Harris
GRAYSON ET AL. v. HARRIS ET AL. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP' THE : . STATE OF OKLAHOMA. - No. 187. Argued January 16, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Judgment held reviewable by certiorari and not by writ of error. P. 353.
Cairo, Truman & Southern Railroad v. United States
CAIRO, TRUMAN & SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP. CLAIMS. No. 230. Argued January 23, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. - 1.. An agreement between a railroad'company and the Director General of Railroads
St. Louis, Kennett & Southeastern Railroad v. United States
ST. LOUIS, KENNETT & SOUTHEASTERN RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 229. Argued January 23, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. A railroad company in a contract with the Director General of Railroads expr
Mitchell v. United States
MITCHELL ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT-OP CLAIMS. No. 176. Argued January 15, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. The Act of'October 6, 1917, c. 79, 40 Stat. 345, to increase facilities for testing ordnance materials, appropria
Merritt v. United States
MERRITT v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 159. Argued January 5, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Action by a sub-contractor in the Court of Claims, held not maintainable under the Dent Act, §§ 1 and 4, the petition not
Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.
CANNON MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. CUDAHY PACKING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR . THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 255. Argued January 28, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Defendant, a Maine corporatio
Fort Smith Light & Traction Co. v. Bourland
FORT SMITH LIGHT & TRACTION COMPANY v. BOURLAND ET AL., CITY COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 220. Argued January 22, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. An order in effect
Smyth v. Asphalt Belt Railway Co.
SMYTH ET AL. v. ASPHALT BELT RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, TRANSFERRED FROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH. CIRCUIT, PURSUANT TO THE A
George W. Bush & Sons Co. v. Maloy
GEORGE W. BUSH & SONS COMPANY v. MALOY ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND. ERROR'TO THE COURT OP APPEALS ÓP THE STATE OP MARYLAND. , No. 185. Argued January 16, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. A statute of Maryla
Buck v. Kuykendall
BUCK v. KUYKENDALL, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE, WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 345. Argued November 25, 1924. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Section 4, of
United States v. Archibald McNeil & Sons Co.
UNITED STATES v. ARCHIBALD McNEIL & SONS CO., INC. ERROR TO' THE hISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 444. Argued January 9, 12, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. •1. In the absence of a bill of excep
Davis v. Newton Coal Co.
DAVIS, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, ETC., OPERATING PHILADELPHIA & READING RAILWAY, v. NEWTON COAL COMPANY. DAVIS, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, ETC., OPERATING PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, v. NEWTON COAL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
Chicago Great Western Railroad v. Schendel
CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. SCHENDEL, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF RING, DECEASED. CERTIOEARÍ TO1 THE SUPREME. COURT QE THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. No. 422. Argued January 6, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Where a freight car w
United States v. Cornell Steamboat Co.
UNITED STATES v. CORNELL STEAMBOAT COMPANY. Appeal prom the Court op Claims. No. 265. Argued January 28, 29, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. Tug-boats were chartered to the United States for a per diem for each and every day of the charter per
Fulton National Bank of Atlanta v. Hozier
FULTON NATIONAL BANK OF ATLANTA v. HOZIER INTERVENER; AND SMITH, ET AL., AS RECEIVERS OF IMBRIE & COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 260. Submitted January 27, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. A co
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.