Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1925 Cases
289 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Linder v. United States
LINDER v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 183. Submitted March 9, 1925. Decided April 13, 1925. 1. Any provision of an act of Congress ostensibly enacted under power granted by the Consti
Oliver v. United States
A. J. OLIVER, AS TRUSTEE, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FfDROTHE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 180. Submitted March 2, 1925. Decided April 13, 1925. Under § 64 of the Bankruptcy Act, federal and state taxes are to
Nyquist v. United States
No. 963. Sven Nyquist v. United States. April 13, 1925. Mr.Edward J. McCrossin for petitioner. • The Attorney General for the United States.
Williams v. Christopher
No. 854. Minnie M. Williams, etc., Executrix, etc., et al., v. Freeman B. Christopher. April 13, 1925. Mr. David F. Pugh and Mr. L. R. Pugh for petitioner. Mr. James N. Linton for respondent.
Alejandrino v. Quezon
No. 972. Jose Alejandrino v. Manuel L. Quezon et al. April 13, 1925. Mr. Claro M. Recto for petitioner. Mr. Pablo G. Corinsta and Mr. Guillermo B. Guervara for respondents.
Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations of Kansas
CHAS. WOLFF PACKING COMPANY v. THE COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF.THE STATE OF KANSAS. Nos. 207 & 299. Argued Nov. 20, 1924. Decided April 13, 1925. 1. When a judgment entered by a state
Modern Woodmen of America v. Mixer
MODERN WOODMEN OF AMERICA v. JENNIE V. MIXER. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA: ' No. 308. Submitted March 18, 1925. Decided April 13, 1925. 1. .Becoming a member of'an incorporated beneficiary society is more than a contract.; i
Lee v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.
LEE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF LEWIS C. PAINE v. LEHIGH VALLEY COAL COMPANY & KATE P. DIXON. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 222. Argued January 22, 1925. Decided April 13,
Yeiser v. Dysart
YEISER v. DYSART, ET AL. .."ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEBRASKA. No. 130. Submitted October 24, 1924. Decided April 13, 1925. A State may restrict the fees chargeable by attorneys at law in cases arising under the state work
Cooke v. United States
COOKE v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE . FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 311. Argued March 20, 1925. Decided April 13, 1925. 1. On the day following a trial in the District Court in which a verdict had been rendered a
Santa Fe Pacific Railroad v. Work
SANTA FE PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. WORK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. APPEAL PROM. THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ' No. 302. Argued March 18, 19, 1925. Decided April 13, 1925. 1. The construction of a law of the United St
Steele v. United States No. 2
STEELE v. UNITED STATES No. 2. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE' SOUTHERN' DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.. No. 636. Argued March 11, 1925. Decided April 13, 1925. 1. A judgment upholding a search warrant on a petition to vaca
Steele v. United States No. 1
STEELE v. UNITED STATES No. 1. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 235. Argued March 11, 1925. Decided April 13, 1925. 1. Description, in a search warrant, of a building as a garage
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Georgia Public Service Commission
WESTERN & ATLANTIC RAILROAD v. GEORGIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ET AL. APPEAL ■'•FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 209. Argued January 20, 1925. Decided April 13, 1925. 1. A rule of a st
Bohler v. Callaway
BOHLER, TAX COLLECTOR OF RICHMOND COUNTY, GEORGIA, ET AL. v. CALLAWAY, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF J. B. WHITE, DECEASED. CALLAWAY, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF J. B. WHITE, DECEASED, v. BOHLER, TAX COLLECTOR OF RICHMOND COUNTY, GEORGIA, ET AL.
Wells v. Bodkin
WELLS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES E. WELLS, DECEASED, v. BODKIN ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 144. Argued March 6, 1925. Decided April 13, 1925. The Act of May 14, 1880, confers a pr
Bauer Cooperage Co. v. Stark
No. 948. No. 949. No. 950. No. 951. Bauer Cooperage Company v. Edgar Stark, Executor, etc.; Bauer Cooperage Company v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Company; Bauer Cooperage Company v. Lawrence Maxwell Company; and Bauer Cooperage Company v. E
Missouri Pacific Railroad Compact v. Walnut-Ridge-Alicia Road Improvement District
No. 269. Missouri Pacific Railroad Compact v. Walnut-Ridge-Alicia Road Improvement District. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted March. 16, 1925; Decided March 23, 1925. Messrs. G. B. Rose, D. H. Cantrell, J. F. Loughborough, and, A. W. D
United States v. P. Lorillard Co.
UNITED STATES v. P. LORILLARD COMPANY. -APPEAL FROM .THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 319. Argued March 13, 1925. Decided March 23, 1925. By Rev. Stats. § '3386, as amended, a, drawback on. tobacco, etc., subsequently exported, on which thg tax has
Donnelly v. Massachusetts
No. 326. Thomas F. Donnelly v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. March 20, 1925. Mr. Thomas F. Donnelly for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Clegg v. City of Spartanburg
No. 357. W. F. Clegg et al., etc., v. City of Spartanburg et al. March 16, 1925. on motion of Mr. Sam J. Nicholls for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Horance L. Bomar for defendant in error.
Butterick Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
No. 906. The Butterick Company et al. v. The Federal Trade Commission. March 16, 1925. Messrs. Herbert Noble, Scott Scammell, Julius M. Mayer and Hartwell P. Heath for petitioners. Solicitor General Beck and Mr. William H. Fuller for respon
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.
No. 922. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company of Hartford v. Southern Pacific Company et al. March 16, 1925. Mr. E. C. Brandenburg for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
Federal Trade Commission v. Hammond
No. 48. No. 49. No. 50. Federal Trade Commission v. Hammond, Snyder & Company; Federal Trade Commission v. Baltimore Grain Company; and Federal Trade Commission v. H. C. Jones Company, Inc. Error to the District Court of the United States f
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.