Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1925 Cases
289 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
E. E. McCalla Co. v. California
No. 321. E. E. McCalla Company et al. v. People of the State of California. Error to the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, of the State qf California. Argued March' 10, 1925. Decided March 16, 1925. Mr. F. L. Guerena, wit
Gilseth v. Risty
No. 248. Oluf O. Gilseth v. A. G. Risty et al. Error to the Circuit Court of Minnehaha County, South Dakota. Motion to dismiss submitted March 9, 1925. Decided March 16, 1925. Mr. William G. Porter for defendants in error in support of the
Lewis v. Roberts
LEWIS v. ROBERTS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE. PIFTH CIRCUIT... No. 284. Argued January 29, 1925. Decided March 16, 1925. Under § 63a of the Bankruptcy Act, including among provable debts “(1) a fixed liability, as ev
Olson v. United States Spruce Production Corp.
OLSON ET AL., CO-PARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF OLSON BROS. OR OLSON & OLSON v. UNITED STATES SPRUCE PRODUCTION CORPORATION. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. , No. 128. Argued Mar
Reich v. McNeil
No. 900. Samuel Reich, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc. v. Kenneth W. McNeil. March 9, 1925. Mr. William H, Cowley for petitioner. Mr. Edward M. Grout for respondent.
Traylor Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp.
No. 884. Traylor Engineering and Manufacturing Company v. Worthington Pump and Machinery Corporation. March 9, 1925. Messrs. Frank B. Fox, Henry N. Paul and George Wharton Pepper for petitioner. Mr. James Rice and Mr. Chas. H. Hawson for re
Mellot v. Mabee
No. 877. Howard S. Mellot v. Charles R. Mabee et al., Trustees in Bankruptcy, etc. March 9, 1925. Mr. Donald F. Melhorn for petitioner. Mr. Allen J. Seney for respondent.
Mullen v. United States
No. 837. John Mullen et al. v. United States. March 9, 1925. Mr. C. B. Tinkham for petitioners. The Attorney General for the United States.
Pacific American Fisheries v. Territory of Alaska
No. 844. Pacific American Fisheries v. Territory of Alaska. March 9, 1925. Mr. E. S. McCord, Mr. Warren Gregory and Mr. R. E. Robertson for petitioner. Mr. John Rust-gard for respondent.
North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Soley
No. 364. North Pacific Steamship Company v. William T. Soley. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of California. Submitted March 2, 1925. Decided March 9, 1925. Mr. Ernest Clewe>for plaintiff in error. Mr. HeWy-Seidelberg and Mr. Warren
New Mexico v. Colorado
No. 12, Original. State of New Mexico v. State of Colorado. In Equity. Motion for modification .of decree submitted March 2, 1925. March 9, 1925, Messrs. F. W. Clancy, O. A. Larrazolo and Jay Turley for complainant. Messrs. Wm. L. Boatright
Horowitz v. United States
HOROWITZ v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS.. No. 74. Argued October 15, 1924. Decided March 9, 1925. ,1. The United States, when sued as a contractor, can not be held liable for an obstruction to the performance of the ¿/art
Sanford & Brooks Co. v. United States
SANFORD & BROOKS CO. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 175. Argued January 15, 1925. Decided March 9, 1925. 1. Where a Government contract for dredging expressly ■ required prompt, written protest against any order for
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 13, Original. Decree entered March 9, 1925. Decree reciting and confirming the report by commissioners of the survey, location and marking of a part of the bound
Brooks v. United States
BROOKS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 286. Argued January 30, 1925. Decided March 9, 1925. 1. The Act punishing the transportation of stolen motor vehicles in interst
Lancaster v. McCarty
LANCASTER ET AL., RECEIVERS OF THE TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY, v. McCARTY ET AL. ERROR TO THE COURT OP CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE SECOND SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OP THE STATE OP TEXAS. No. 148. Submitted December 11, 1924. Decided March 9, 1925. T
Continental Casualty Co. v. Agee
No. 879. Continental Casualty Company, etc., et al. v. Alfred W. Agee, Administrator, etc. March 2, 1925. on motion of Mr. William W. Ray' for the petitioners. Messrs. James L. DeVine, James A. Howell and Charles: R. Hollingsworth for respo
Myers v. Anderson
No. 291. L. H. Myers et al. v. Charles H. Anderson et al., Copartners, etc., et al. March 2, 1925. Mr. George C. Bedell and Mr. I. L. Purcell for petitioners. Mr. Giles J. Patterson for respondents.
Hunter v. United States
No. 843. Clyde Hunter v. United States. March 2, 1925. Messrs. Clair McTuman, William R. Higgins, Charles M. McCabe and Merrill Moores, for petitioner. Solicitor General Beck and Assistant Attorney . General Willebrandt .for the United Stat
Guardian Savings & Trust Co. v. Road Improvement District No. 7
No. 389. Guardian Savings & Trust Company, Trustee, v. Road Improvement District No. 7 of Poinsett County, Arkansas. Order entered March 2, 1925.
Singleton v. Georgia
No. 267. W. C. Singleton v. State of Georgia. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia. Submitted January 29, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. Mr. G. Y. Harrell and Mr. John C. Cooper for plaintiff in error, submitted. No brief filed
Corby Estate v. City of St. Joseph
No. 562. Corby Estate v. City of St. Joseph. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. Motion to dismiss submitted January 12, 1925: Decided March 2, 1925. Mr. John E. Dolman for plaintiff in error. Mr. H. K. White for defendant
Pearson v. United States
PEARSON ET VIR v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 264. Argued January 28, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. Where the Government erected and used biddings on leased land with the oral permission of the lessee, and subsequentl
Price v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
PRICE ET AL. v. MAGNOLIA PETROLEUM COMPANY ET AL. ERROR'TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 14. Argued November 13, 14, 1923. Decided March 2, 1925. The Oklahoma Enabling Act provided that sections 33 of the public lands, the
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.