Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1903 Cases
273 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Sweet
UNITED STATES v. SWEET. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 236. Argued and submitted April 15, 1903. Decided April 27, 1903. An officer of volunteers in tbe United States Army who tenders his resignation and is honorably discharged is not
Gordon v. Randle
GORDON v. RANDLE. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 229. Argued April 7, 1903. Decided April 27, 1903. Under the rules of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, the January terms begin on the first Tuesd
Chattanooga National Building & Loan Ass'n v. Denson
CHATTANOOGA NATIONAL BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION v. DENSON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 206. Submitted March 12, 1903. Decided April 27, 1903. The highest court of Alabama has held that under the
Onondaga Nation v. Thacher
ONONDAGA NATION v. THACHER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 234. Argued April 8, 9, 1903. Decided April 27, 1903. Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction, because no claim of Federal right was specially set
Wiser v. Lawler
WISER v. LAWLER. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 174. Argued February 25, 26, 1903. Decided April 27, 1903. Promoters of mining enterprises, in the preparation of prospectuses, are bound to consider the effect
Sawyer v. Piper
SAWYER v. PIPER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 225. Argued April 6, 7, 1903. Decided April 27, 1903. The mere averment of the existence of a Federal question is not sufficient to give this court jurisdiction, but
In re Key
In re KEY. ORIGINAL. No. 13. Argued April 6, 1903. Decided April 27, 1903. Judgment before a justice of the peace of the District of Columbia against Key and Scott, and appeal to the Supreme Court of the District with a Guaranty Company as
Jaquith v. Alden
JAQUITH v. ALDEN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 516. Submitted January 12, 1903. Decided April 27, 1903. Payments on a running account, in the usual course of business, by a person whose property had ac
Lyon v. Gombret
No. 357. Mary J. Lyon et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Margaret Gombret et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted April 6, 1903. Decided April 20, 1903. Mr. Lionel C. Burr and Mr. Char
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Behymer
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. BEHYMER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 224. Argued March 20, April 6, 1903. Decided April 20, 1903. Tn an action for personal injuries sustained by a brakeman by fallin
Lawrence v. Board of Street Commissioners
No. 274. John Lawrence et al., Trustees, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Board of Street Commissioners of the City of Boston. Error to the Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Massachusetts. April 13, 1903. Mr. J. JT. Benton, Jr., for plain
White v. Wright
No. 535. Almond A. White, Plaintiff in Error, v. Sidney L. Wright et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. Motion to dismiss submitted April 6, 1903. Decided April 13, 1903. Mr. Orville Pinehart for plaintiff in error. M
United States v. Mission Rock Co.
UNITED STATES v. MISSION ROCK COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 198. Argued March 11, 1903. Decided April 13, 1903. The State of California upon its admission into the Union acquired absolute property
Mexican Central Railway Co. v. Duthie
MEXICAN CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY, LIMITED, v. DUTHIE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNTID STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 336. Submitted March 23, 1903 Decided April 13, 1903. Under section 954, Kev, Stat., the Circuit Cour
Union & Planters' Bank v. Memphis
UNION AND PLANTERS’ BANK v. MEMPHIS. SAME v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AND FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. Nos. 67, 221. Submitted March 20, 1903
Downman v. German Insurance
No. 619. Robert H. Downman et al., Petitioners, v. German Insurance Company of Freeport, Ill. April 6, 1903. Mr. H. N. Atkinson for petitioners. No appearance for respondent..
The Paquete Habana
THE PAQUETE HABANA. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Nos. 578, 579, 580, 581, 582, 583, 584, 585, 586, 587, 588, 589. Argued March 19, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. This court having
Southern Pacific Railroad v. United States
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 190. Argued March 9, 10, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. Under tbe act. of March 3, 1871, c. 122, 16 Stat. 573, the rights
San Diego Land & Town Co. v. Jasper
SAN DIEGO LAND AND TOWN COMPANY v. JASPER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 193. Argued March 10, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. In this action it was held that the rates for wate
Detroit, Fort Wayne & Belle Isle Railway v. Osborn
DETROIT, FORT WAYNE AND BELLE ISLE RAILWAY v. OSBORN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. Argued January 15, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. 1. Where the plaintiff in error claimed and set up a right under the Constitution of
Zane v. Hamilton County
ZANE v. HAMILTON COUNTY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 115. Argued and submitted December 5, 1902. Decided April 6, 1903. Where the highest court of a State has decided that fhe act of the legislatu
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Carlin
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. CARLIN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 222. Argued March 20, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. Where it is the special duty of the foreman of a gang repairing a bridge to see
Thayer v. Spratt
THAYER v. SPRATT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 207. Argued March 12, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. On proceedings to cancel an entry which has been transferred, where the Land Department has notice thereof, aüd
Finney v. Guy
FINNEY v. GUY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 180. Argued February 27, March 2, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. Where a ease turns upon the construction by a state court of a statute of another State, and not upon th
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.