Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1912 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Hygienic Fleeced Underwear Co. v. Phœnix Knitting Works
No. 1110. Hygienic Fleeced Underwear Company, Petitioner, v. Phœnix Knitting Works et al. May 27, 1912. Mr. Hector T. Fenton' for the petitioner. Mr. Joseph C. Fraley and Mr. H. N. Paul, Jr., for the respondents.
Anderson v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.
No. 641. and No. 642. M. Anderson v. The Pacific Coast Steamship Company, Claimant of the Steamship “Queen,” etc.; N. Jordan v. The Pacific Coast Company, Claimant of the Steamship “Umatilla,” etc. May 27, 1912. Mr. William Dennian for the
Indian-Protective Ass'n v. Gordon
No. 262. Indian-Protective Association, Appellant, v. Hugh H. Gordon et al. Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. Motion to affirm submitted May 13, 1912. Decided May 27, 1912. Mr. Charles Poe, Air. Benjamin S. Minor
Johannessen v. United States
JOHANNESSEN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 230. Submitted April 22, 1912. Decided May 27, 1912. Prior decisions of this court holding that a judgment of a c
United States v. Colorado Anthracite Co.
UNITED STATES v. COLORADO ANTHRACITE CO. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 227. Argued April 25, 1912. Decided May 27, 1912. An assign within the meaning of § 2 of the act of June 16, 1880, 21 Stat. 287, c. 244, is one who becomes invest
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bray
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY v. BRAY. APPEAL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 111. Argued December 15, 1911. Decided May 27, 1912. Section 7 of the Court of Appeals Act of 1891, as amended April
Anderson v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.
ANDERSON v. PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY, CLAIMANT OF THE STEAMSHIP “QUEEN.” JORDAN v. PACIFIC COAST COMPANY, CLAIMANT OF THE STEAMSHIP “UMATILLA,” ETC. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 641, 642.
National Bank of Newport v. National Herkimer County Bank of Little Falls
NATIONAL BANK OF NEWPORT, NEW YORK, v. NATIONAL HERKIMER COUNTY BANK OF LITTLE FALLS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 172. Argued February 28, 29, 1912. Decided May 27, 1912. To constitute a preference u
Jordan v. Massachusetts
JORDAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 519. Argued April 16, 1912. Decided May 27, 1912. Subject to the requirement of due process of law, the States are under no restr
Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Kirby
CHICAGO & ALTON RAILROAD COMPANY v. KIRBY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 226. Argued April 25, 1912. Decided May 27, 1912. The implied agreement of a common carrier is to carry safely and deliver at destination wi
Stalker v. Oregon Short Line Railroad
STALKER v. OREGON SHORT LINE RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR to the supreme court oe THE STATE OF IDAHO. No. 225. Argued April 24, 1912. Decided May 27, 1912. The act of March 3, 1875, 18 Stat. 482, c. 152, granting rights of way and station ground
Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.
BIGELOW v. OLD DOMINION COPPER MINING AND SMELTING CO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. Nos. 191, 192. Argued March 5, 6, 1912. Decided May 27, 1912. One of two joint tort-feasors was sued in the'Circuit Co
Railroad Commission of Ohio v. Worthington
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF OHIO v. WORTHINGTON, RECEIVER OF WHEELING & LAKE ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AND THE UNITED • STATES CIRCUIT COURT POR. THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP OHIO, EASTERN
Southern Railway Co. v. Burlington Lumber Co.
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. BURLINGTON LUMBER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 236. Argued May 3, 1912. Decided May 27, 1912. Decided on authority, of Southern Railway Company v. Reid, 222 U. S. 424, a
Sexton v. Kessler & Co.
SEXTON, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF KESSLER & COMPANY, v. KESSLER & COMPANY, LIMITED. APPEAL FROM; THE CIRCUIT COURT OF- APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, No. 92. Argued December 12, 13, 1911. Decided May 27, 1912. The conduct of business men ac
Chase v. Wetzlar
CHASE v. WETZLAR, EXECUTOR. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, No. 1045. Submitted April 22, 1912. Decided May 27, 1912. Where the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court is dependent, under
Maryland v. West Virginia
THE STATE OF MARYLAND v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. IN EQUITY. No. 1, Original. Motion to confirm majority report of Commissioners. Submitted April 29, 1912. Decided May 27 1912. Report of Commissioners appointed by decree of May 31, 1910, to
Ashley v. Samuel C. Tatum Co.
No. 1042. Frank M. Ashley, Petitioner, v. The Samuel C. Tatum Company. May 13, 1912. Mr. Frank E.-Rapp for the petitioner. Mr. E. E. Wood and Mr. William R. Wood for the respondent.
Valdes v. Central Altagracia, Inc.
VALDES v. CENTRAL ALTAGRACIA, INCORPORATED. CENTRAL ALTAGRACIA v. VALDES. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. Nos. 193, 196. Submitted March 6, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. The record in this case shows that
The Jason
THE JASON. ON CERTIFICATE FROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 220. Argued April 18, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. A general average agreement inserted in bills of lading, providing that if the owner of
English v. Richardson
ENGLISH v. RICHARDSON, TREASURER OF TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP' OKLAHOMA. No. 559. Argued February 23, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. Decided on authority of Choate v. Trapp, ante, p. 665. 28 Oklahoma, 4
Gleason v. Wood
GLEASON v. WOOD, COUNTY TREASURER OF PITTSBURG COUNTY, OKLAHOMA. ERROR to the supreme COURT OP THE state op OKLAHOMA. No. 575. Argued February 23, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. Decided on authority of Choate v. Trapp, ante, p. 665. 28 Oklahom
Choate v. Trapp
CHOATE v. TRAPP, SECRETARY OF THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF OKLAHOMA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 809. Argued February ?3, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. There is a broad distinction between the power to abrog
City of Louisville v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.
CITY OF LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY, v. CUMBERLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. APPEAL Prom the circuit court of the united states FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 197. Argued March 7, 8, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. Under the then con
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.