Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1912 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Merchants & Miners' Transportation Co. v. Robinson Baxter-Dissosway Towing & Transportation Co.
No. 1051. No. 1052. and No. 1053. Merchants & Miners’ Transportation Company, Petitioner, v. Robinson Baxter-Dissosway Towing & Transportation Company et al.; Merchants & Miners’ Transportation Company et al., Petitioners, v. General Chemic
United States v. Terminal Railroad
UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 386. Argued October 20, 23, 1911. Decided April 22, 1912. Whether the unification of t
Gromer v. Standard Dredging Co.
GROMER, TREASURER OF PORTO RICO, v. STANDARD DREDGING COMPANY,.. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 174. Submitted February 28, 1911. Decided April 22, 1912. Qucere: whether § 12 of the act of Legislativ
Byles v. Arkansas
No. 267. W. H. Byles, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Arkansas. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas. April 18, 1912. Mr: A. C. Lyon for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Hal L. Norwood for the defendant in error. ■
Mullen v. United States
MULLEN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FBOM THE CIBCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 404. Argued October 12, 13, 1911. Decided April 15, 1912. The relations of the United States and the Choctaw Indians by treaties and statutes in r
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Wynne
ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. WYNNE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 103. Submitted December 14, 1911. Decided April 15, 1912. A state statute which attaches onerous penalties to the non-payment
Mayor of Baltimore v. Miller
No. 1064. The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Petitioners, v. Andrew Miller et al. April 8, 1912. Mr. Sylvan Hayes Lauchheimer and Mr: Alexander Preston for the petitioner. No appearance for the respondents.
Tiedt v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
No. 1049. Frederick C. Tiedt, Petitioner, v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company. April 8, 1912. Mr. Fred W. Bentley for the petitioner. Mr. Robert Dunlap and Mr. J. L. Coleman for the respondent.
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Lewellen Bros.
No. 1018. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company, Petitioner, v. Lewellen Brothers. April 8, 1912. Mr. Roy F. Britton, Mr. E. B. Perkins and Mr. Samuel H. West for the petitioner. No appearance for the respondent.
Atlantic Transport Co. v. Imbrovek
No. 1028. and No. 1029. Atlantic Transport Company of West Virginia, Petitioner, v. Frank Imbrovek; Atlantic Transport Company of West Virginia, Petitioner, v. State of Maryland, to the Use, etc. April 8, 1912. Mr. Nicholas P. Bond and Mr.
Andrews v. Partridge
No. 907. Hannah L. Andrews, Executrix, etc., Appellant, v. Harvey K. Partridge, Trustee, etc. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted April 1, 1912. Decided April 8
de Galard de Brassac de Bearn v. de Bearn
No. 797. No. 798. No. 799. No. 800. and No. 801. Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Francois de Bearn et al.; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error,
Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Nichols
TITLE GUARANTY & SURETY COMPANY v. NICHOLS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 102. Argued December 13, 1911. Decided April 8, 1912. While liability under a surety bond for honesty of an employé would be defeated if
City of Pomona v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.
CITY OF POMONA v. SUNSET TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE .CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 215. Argued March 14, 15, 1912. Decided April 8, 1912. A provision in a state constitution that municipal corpora
United States v. Société Anonyme Des Anciens Etablissements Caíl
THE UNITED STATES v. SOCIÉTÉ ANONYME DES ANCIENS ETABLISSEMENTS CAÍL. SOCIÉTÉ ANONYME DES ANCIENS ETABLISSE-MENTS CAIL v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. Nos. 209, 210. Argued March 12, 13, 1912. Decided April 8, 1912. In o
Crozier v. Fried. Krupp Aktiengesellschaft
CROZIER v. FRIED. KRUPP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 8. Argued April 30, 1911. Decided April 8, 1912. Prior to the passage of the act of June 25, 1910, 36 Stat. 851, c. 423, a paten
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Cauble
No. 493. Texas & Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. B. B. Cauble. In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. April 2, 1912. Mr. W. L. Hall for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Theodore Mack for the
Hillman v. United States
No. 1020. Clarence Dayton Hillman, Petitioner, v. The United States. April 1, 1912. Mr. Wade H. Ellis, Mr. T. F. Bevington. and Mr. Abner H. Ferguson for the-petitioner. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the respondent:
Heckman v. United States
HECKMAN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 496. Argued October 12, 13, 1911. Decided April 1, 1912. The United States has capacity to maintain a suit to set aside conveyances made by allot
Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri
STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF INDIANA v. STATE OF MISSOURI ON THE INFORMATION OF HADLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, SUCCEEDED BY MAJOR. REPUBLIC OIL COMPANY v. SAME ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. Nos. 47, 48. Argued November 8, 9, 19
Brinkmeier v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
BRINKMEIER v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 206. Submitted March 11, 1912. Decided April 1, 1912. The Safety Appliance Act of March 2, 1893, 27 Stat. 531, c. 196, did not embrace all car
Holt v. Crucible Steel Co. of America
HOLT, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF DAVIS, KELLY & CO., v. CRUCIBLE STEEL COMPANY OF AMERICA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 183. Argued March 4, 1912. Decided April 1, 1912. Under § 67a of the Bankruptcy Act
Converse v. Hamilton
CONVERSE, RECEIVER, v. HAMILTON. SAME v. McCAULEY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WISCONSIN. Nos. 42, 43. Argued November 7, 1911. Decided April 1, 1912. This court looks to the constitution and statutes of a State and the decis
Sharpe v. Bonham
SHARPE v. BONHAM. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OP TENNESSEE. No. 396. Submitted March 12, 1912. Decided April 1, 1912. In á controversy which embraces the rights of an association, the ■mastery
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.