Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1912 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gritts v. Fisher
GRITTS v. FISHER, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, AND MacVEAGH, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF' COLUMBIA. No. 896. Argued January 10, 11, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. Children born to enrolled membe
Cross Lake Shooting & Fishing Club v. Louisiana
CROSS LAKE SHOOTING AND FISHING CLUB v. STATE OF LOUISIANA. error to the supreme court of the state of LOUISIANA. No. 46. Argued April 18, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. The contract clause of the Federal Constitution is not directed against a
Graham v. West Virginia
GRAHAM v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 721. Argued April 17, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. The statute of West Virginia, providing that where a prisoner has been convicted an
Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. Schubert
PHILADELPHIA, BALTIMORE AND WASHINGTON RAILROAD COMPANY v. SCHUBERT. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 549. Argued April 29, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. Congress has power to impose the liability on the employer
B. Altman & Co. v. United States
B. ALTMAN & CO. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 208. Argued April 25, 26, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. This court will entertain a direct review of the judgment
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Howell
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. HOWELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 947. Submitted April 22, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. ■Where the basis for review by this court has no bearing on the questions raise
Leary v. United States
LEARY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF LEARY, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 508. Argued April 29, 30,1912. Decided May 13, 1912. In a suit brought by the United States to charge the defendant with
Waskey v. Chambers
WASKEY v. CHAMBERS. CERTIORARI to the circuit court of appeals for the NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 221. Argued April 23, 24, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. The word “ conveyance ” as used in § 98 of the act of June 6, 1900, c. 786, 31 Stat. 321, 505, i
McCaughey v. Lyall
McCAUGHEY v. LYALL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 228. Submitted April 19, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. Section 1582 of the Code of Civil Procedure of California, as construed by the Supreme Court of that State,
American Railroad v. Birch
AMERICAN RAILROAD COMPANY OF PORTO RICO v. BIRCH. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT - COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 224. Submitted April 24, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. The Employers’ Liability Act of 1908 expressly applies to, and is
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Castle
THE MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. CASTLE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 344. Submitted April 22, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. This court has repeatedly held that a State may impose up
Nielsen v. Steinfeld
NIELSEN, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. STEINFELD. APPEAR FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 218. Argued April 17, 18, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912. There are exceptions to the general rule that a judgment on appeal from a territoria
Hanson v. Gustafson
No. 241. John F. Hanson, Plaintiff in Error, v. Emil Gustafson. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. May 1, 1912. Mr. John F. Hanson, pro. se. No appearance for the defendant in error. May 13. Judgment of dismissal vacated
City of St. Augustine v. Thompson
No. 1081. The City of St. Augustine, Petitioner, v. Minnie Thompson. April 29, 1912. Mr. E. P. Axtell and Mr. C. D. Rinehart for the petitioner. Mr. William W. Dewhurst, Mr. Horatio Bisbee and Mr. George,C. Bedell for the respondent.
Duffield v. Ashurst
No. 231. Elmer H. Duffield, Appellant, v. Henry F. Ashurst, as District Attorney, etc. Appeal from' the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona. Argued April 26, 1912. Decided April 29, 1912. Mr. T. J. Norton, Mr. Gardiner Lathrop, and Mr
Washington ex rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Fairchild
STATE OF WASHINGTON EX REL. OREGON RAILROAD AND NAVIGATION COMPANY v. FAIRCHILD ET AL., STATE RAILROAD COMMISSIONERS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WASHINGTON. No. 118. Argued December 18, 1911. Decided April 29, 1912. An order
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Dennis
GULF, COLORADO & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. v. DENNIS. ERROR TO THE COUNTY COURT OP MILAM COUNTY, STATE OP TEXAS. No. 203. Submitted March 6, 1912. Decided April 29, 1912. The county court in Texas, being the highest court of the State to which t
Herndon-Carter Co. v. James N. Norris, Son & Co.
HERNDON-CARTER COMPANY v. JAMES N. NORRIS, SON & COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 923. Submitted April 1, 1912. Decided April 29, 1912. Where jurisdiction of the Circuit C
American Security & Trust Co. v. Commissioners of the District of Columbia
AMERICAN SECURITY AND TRUST COMPANY v. COMMISSIONERS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. PETITION FOB A WRIT OF ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Submitted April 15, 1912. Decided April 29, 1912. The jurisdiction of this c
Washington Home for Incurables v. American Security & Trust Co.
WASHINGTON HOME FOR INCURABLES v. AMERICAN SECURITY AND TRUST COMPANY. VERMILLION v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. APPLICATIONS POE THE ALLOWANCE OP AN APPEAL PEOM THE COUET OP APPEALS OP THE DISTBICT OP COLUMBIA, AND POE A WEIT OP E
Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States ex rel. Humboldt Steamship Co.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. HUMBOLDT STEAMSHIP COMPANY. ERROR TO. THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT .OP COLUMBIA. No. 859. Argued April 16, 1912. Decided April 29, 1912. Alaska is a Territory of the
Deming Investment Co. v. United States
DEMING INVESTMENT COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 434. Argued October 12, 13, 1911. Decided April 29, 1912. Goat v. United States, ante, p. 458, followed in regard to validity
Goat v. United States
GOAT v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 405. Argued October 12, 13, 1911. Decided April 29, 1912. Heckman v. United States, ante, p. 413, followed to effect that the United States has capa
St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Herr
No. 1082. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, Petitioner, v. W. A. Herr, Administrator, etc. April 22, 1912. Mr. II. Generes Dufour, Mr. L. Russell Alden, Mr. Walter F. Evans and Mr. E. T. Miller for the petitioner. No appearance fo
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.