Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1913 Cases
359 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Southern Pacific Railroad v. United States
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 269. Argued April 30, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. The Land Grant Adjustment Acts of 1887 and 1896 did not provide for an
Hastings v. Malone
No. 1089. H. G. Hastings et al., Petitioners, v. W. D. Malone. May 12, 1913. Mr. Wm. F. Ramsey and Mr. Samuel Wm. Fisher for the petitioners. Mr. Will G. Barber for the respondent.
Riter-Conley Mfg. Co. v. Aiken
No. 1051. Riter-Conley Mfg. Co., Petitioner, v. Nellie C. Aiken and Nellie C. Aiken, Jr. May 12, 1913. Mr. E. W. Bradford, Mr. Wm. G. Doolittle and Mr. Henry P. Doolittle for the petitioner. Mr. Robert D. Totten and Mr. James I. Kay for the
Munsuri v. Lord
No. 1000. Julian Munsuri, Appellant, v. C. O. Lord, Trustee, etc. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for Porto Rico. Motion to dismiss submitted April 28, 1913. Decided May 12, 1913. Mr. Frederic R. Coudert and Mr. Howard T
Lewis Publishing Co. v. Wyman
LEWIS PUBLISHING COMPANY v. WYMAN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 179. Argued March 11, 1913. Decided May 12, 1913. The admission of a magazine to second-class mail privileges on the petition of the own
Bailey v. Sanders
BAILEY v. SANDERS. APPEAL FROM THE CIECUIT COUET OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIECUIT. • No. 271. Submitted April 30, 1913. Decided May 12, 1913. On the facts disclosed by the record in this , case, the finding by the Land Department that there
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
CONSOLIDATED TURNPIKE COMPANY v. NORFOLK & OCEAN VIEW RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO. THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 152. Petition for rehearing submitted April 28, 1913. Decided May 12, 1913. Petition for rehearing g
Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Dixie Tobacco Co.
NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. DIXIE TOBACCO COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA.. No. 265. Argued April 28, 1913. Decided May 12, 1913. Under Atlantic Coast Line v. Riverside Mills, 219 U. S. 186,
Schwartz v. Adams
SCHWARTZ v. ADAMS. WEINER v. ADAMS. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. Nos. 240, 241. Submitted April 21, 1913. Decided May 12, 1913. Decided on authority of preceding case. The facts are stat
Bugajewitz v. Adams
BUGAJEWITZ v. ADAMS, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION INSPECTOR. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED. STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 239. Submitted April 21, 1913. Decided May 12, 1913. Congress has power to order the deportatio
Adams v. City of Milwaukee
ADAMS v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP. THE STATE OP WISCONSIN. No. 247. Argued April 23, 1913. Decided May 12, 1913. The question whether a classification of milk vendors who produce their milk outside of the city to whi
Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. United States ex rel. Harlan & Hollingsworth
TITLE GUARANTY & SURETY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES, TO THE USE OF HARLAN & HOLLINGSWORTH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR ■THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 530. Submitted April 28, 1913. Decided May 12, 1913. As th
Lynch v. Travelers' Insurance
No. 963. Thomas J. Lynch, Executor, etc., Petitioner, v. The Travelers’ Insurance Company. May 5, 1913. Mr. Geo. W. Heselton for the petitioner. Mr. R. Ross Perry, Mr. R. Ross Perry, Jr., and Mr. Harvey D. Eaton for the respondent.
Harrington v. Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Co.
No. 409. George Harrington et al., Appellants, v. The Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Company et al. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Motion to dismiss submitted December 2, 1912. Decided May 5, 19
Ashon v. Conservation Commission
No. 276. No. 277. John Ashon, Appellant, v. The Conservation Commission of Louisiana et al.; and Leong Mow, Appellant, v. The Conservation Commission of Louisiana et al. Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern Di
Colorado & Northwestern Railroad v. United States
No. 2. Colorado & Northwestern Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States. In error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. Submitted October 21, 1912. Decided May 5, 1913. Mr. E. E. Whitted
Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Hackett
CHICAGO, INDIANAPOLIS & LOUISVILLE RAILWAY COMPANY v. HACKETT. ERROR TO THE APPELLATE COURT, FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 889. Submitted February 24, 1913. Decided May 5, 1913. This court has heretofore sustained the constitutiona
Tiaco v. Forbes
TIACO v. FORBES. TICO v. SAME. SY CHANG v. SAME. EEEOE TO THE SUPEEME COUET OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. Nos. 254, 255, 256. Argued April 24, 1913. Decided May 5, 1913. Where'the act originally purports to be done in the name and by the autho
Clarke v. Rogers
CLARKE, TRUSTEE UNDER THE WILL OF PARSONS, v. ROGERS, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF THE ESTATE OF SHAW. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 221. Argued April 16, 17, 1913. Decided May 5, 1913. The same person, con
United States v. Mesa
UNITED STATES v. MESA. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR- THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 864. Argued April 11, 1913. Decided May 5, 1913. Decided on authority of preceding case. 199 Fed. Rep. 518, reversed. The facts
United States v. Chavez
UNITED STATES v. CHAVEZ. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF-.TEXAS. No. 863. Argued April 11, 1913. Decided May 5, 1913. In construing a statute a word used therein may be given the meaning it has i
Union Trust Co. v. Westhus
UNION TRUST COMPANY OF ST. LOUIS v. WESTHUS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN. DISTRICT OF. MISSOURI. ' No. 46. Argued November 8, 11, 1912. Decided May 5, 1913. By the, distribution of power made by the Circu
Ex parte First National Bank
EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF DEXTER, NEW YORK. EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF EDWARDS. IN MANDAMUS. Nos. 11 and 12, Original. No. 11, Argued March 10, 11, 1913. .No. 12, Submitted March 11, 1913. Decided May 5, 1913. St
Nemcof v. United States
No. 1034. Charles Nemcof et al., Petitioners, v. The United States. April 28, 1913. Mr. E. Clinton Rhoads for the petitioner. The Attorney General, Mr. Assistant Attorney General Denison and Mr. Louis G. Bissell for the respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.