Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1913 Cases
359 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Camp v. Boyd
CAMP v. BOYD. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 71. Argued February 28, March 3, 5, 1913. Decided June 9, 1913. Parties in possession of land under titles from various sources and having the equitable, as wel
Studley v. Boylston National Bank
STUDLEY, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF COLLVER TOURS COMPANY v. BOYLSTON NATIONAL BANK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 899. Argued April 14, 1913. Decided June 9, 1913. Nothing in the Bankruptcy Act deprives
American National Bank v. Miller
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE, v. MILLER, AGENT OF THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MACON, GEORGIA. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 325. Argued May 9, 1913. Decided June 9, 1913. Whe
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Hall
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. v. HALL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 249. Submitted April 21, 1913. Decided June 9, 1913. Property exempted under the laws of the State of the bankrupt cannot be garnish
United States v. Mille Lac Band of Chippewa Indians
UNITED STATES v. MILLE LAC BAND OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 736. Argued April 8, 9, 1913. Decided June 9, 1913. When Congress passed the act of January 14,1889, adjusting relations wit
National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers v. Parrish
NATIONAL HOME FOR DISABLED VOLUNTEER SOLDIERS v. PARRISH. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 678. Submitted May 5, 1913. Decided June 9, 1913. The .exemption of the United States from payment of interest on
Bond v. Unknown Heirs of Barela
BOND v. UNKNOWN HEIRS OF BARELA. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 558. Submitted December 17, 1912. Decided June 9, 1913. The proceedings on which the grant involved in this case was issued are substantially
Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Benedict
SINGER SEWING MACHINE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY v. BENEDICT, TREASURER, &c. OF DENVER, COLORADO. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 289. Argued May 5, 1913. Decided June 9, 1913. Under § 723, Rev. Stat., a bill
United States v. Adams Express Co.
UNITED STATES v. ADAMS EXPRESS COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 652. Argued April 7, 1913. Decided June 9, 1913. The decision of the court below, granting a motion to quash the
Nash v. United States
NASH v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE - FIFTH CIRCUIT. ' No. 197. Argued March 18, 19, 1913. Decided June 9, 1913. In ihany instances a'man’s fate depends upon his rightly estimating, that is as the jury
McGovern v. City of New York
McGOVERN v. CITY OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF' NEW YORK. No. 15. Argued November 8, 1912. Decided June 9, 1913. Where the state statute requires condemnation commissioners to determine the just and equitable compe
Donnelly v. United States
DONNELLY v. UNITED STATES. ON PETITION FOB, BEHEAEING. No. 97. Petition for rehearing presented May 31, 1913. Decided June 9, 1913. This court will permit a petition for rehearing to be filed in order to determine whether, it ought to be en
Union Steamboat Co. v. Administrators of the Estate of Chafin
No. 1104. Union Steamboat Company, Petitioner, v. The Administrators of the Estate of Walter Chafin, Deceased, et al. May 26, 1913. Mr. Aldis B. Browne, Mr. Frank H. Scott, Mr. Edgar A. Bancroft, Mr. John E. MacLeish and Mr. W. O. Johnson f
United States v. Lexington Mill & Elevator Co.
No. 1107. The United States, Petitioner, v. Lexington Mill & Elevator Company. May 26, 1913. The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Adkins for petitioner. Mr. E. L. Scarritt for respondent.
United States v. Shelley
UNITED STATES v. SHELLEY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 943. Argued April 11, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. The mere mixing of smoking opium with the residue of opium that has been
United States v. Wright
UNITED STATES v. WRIGHT. error to' the district court of the united states por THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 918. Argued April 11, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. In determining the effect of statutes regarding the introduction of liquo
Citizens National Bank v. Davisson
CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF ROSWELL, NEW MEXICO, v. DAVISSON. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP NEW MEXICO. No. 551. Argued December 4, 1912. Decided May 26, 1913. Under the act of-April 7, 1874, c. 80, § 2, the review by this
Morse v. United States
MORSE v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM . THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 274. Argued May 2, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. A naval officer who had been retired under § 23 of the act of 186.1 for disability not originating in the line of duty and afterwa
Dill v. Ebey
DILL v. EBEY, RECEIVER OF THE CITIZENS’ BANK AND TRUST COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 191. Argued March 17, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. Section 723, Rev. Stat., declaring that suits in equity shall not be
Swigart v. Baker
SWIGART v. BAKER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 944. Argued April 9, 10, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. A statutory provision for charging cost of construction of an improvement against property benefited
First National Bank v. Keys
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CLAREMORE v. KEYS. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF VINITA v. SAME. CITIZENS’ BANK OF PRYOR CREEK v. SAME. HOGAN v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME' COURT OP OKLAHOMA. Nos. 263, 264, 302, 303. Argued April 25, 28, 1913. Decided May
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Prater
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. PRATER. error to the circuit court of appeals for the fifth CIRCUIT. No. 211. Submitted April 15, 1913 Decided May 26, 1913. There.being evidence to sustain the verdict that plaintiff was not guilty of con
Mackay v. Uinta Development Co.
MACKAY v. UINTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 190. Argued March 14, 17, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. Where the defects in service of process and in procedure in the state court
Degge v. Hitchcock
DEGGE v. HITCHCOCK, POSTMASTER GENERAL. MAURY v. SAME. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 157, 158. Argued January 31, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. This is apparently the first case in which a Federal court has b
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.