Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1913 Cases
359 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. Seale
ST. LOUIS, SAN FRANCISCO & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY v. SEALE. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. • No. 857. Argued May 5, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. Where the Federal Employers’
Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
PEDERSEN v. DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT.' No. 698. Argued January 14, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. Under the Employers’ Liability Act a right of recovery exists
City & County of Denver v. New York Trust Co.
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER v. NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER v. DENVER UNION WATER COMPANY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 642, 643. Argued October 28, 29, 1912. Decided May 2
Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Earnest
NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. EARNEST. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 153. Argued January 29, 30, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. The truth of evidence tending-to show a custom a
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Dowell
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. DOWELL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP KANSAS. No. 208. Submitted April 14, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. (Qucere, whether liability to a thir.d person against the master may resul
Shelton v. King
SHELTON v. KING. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 180. Argued March 11, 12, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. Trustees having the power to oxcrci.se discretion will not be interfered with by a court of equity, at
Lewis Blue Point Oyster Cultivation Co. v. Briggs
LEWIS BLUE POINT OYSTER CULTIVATION COMPANY v. BRIGGS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 272. Argued April 30, May 1, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. The determination by the state court of the effect of grants of title t
United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.
UNITED STATES v. CHANDLER-DUNBAR WATER POWER COMPANY. CHANDLER-DUNBAR WATER POWER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ST. MARYS POWER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. BROWN, RECEIVER OF THE MICHIGAN LAKE SUPERIOR POWER COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO TH
Barry v. United States
BARRY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 170. Argued March 6, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. Where a contractor is unable to make deliveries under a contract with the Government for continuous deliveries of a specified arti
Detroit United Railway v. City of Detroit
DETROIT UNITED RAILWAY v. CITY OF DETROIT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 1047. Submitted May 5, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. Franchises granting rights of the public must be in plain language, certain and definite
Big Vein Coal Co. v. Read
BIG VEIN COAL COMPANY OF WEST VIRGINIA v. READ. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 501. Argued April 11, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. A Circuit Court of the United States has no ju
Barrett v. Indiana
BARRETT v. STATE OF INDIANA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP INDIANA. No. 245. Submitted April 18, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. Coal mining is a dangerous business and subject to police regulation by the State. The legislature of
Gorman v. Littlefield
GORMAN v. LITTLEFIELD, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF A. O. BROWN & CO. APPEAL FROM THE .CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 243. Argued April 21, 22, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. Where the trustee of a bankrupt broker finds in th
Bauer & Cie v. O'Donnell
BAUER & CIE v. O’DONNELL. CERTIFICATE FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 951. Argued April 10, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. The right to make, use and sell an invented article existed without, and before, the passage
Sanford v. Ainsa
SANFORD v. AINSA, ADMINISTRATOR. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 504. Argued May 5, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. This court rarely disturbs local decisions of the territorial courts on question of local practic
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Hesterly
ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. HESTERLY, ADMINISTRATOR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE'STATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 297. Argued May 6, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. When the state court has overruled an objection that the
Francis v. McNeal
FRANCIS, PETITIONER, v. McNEAL, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF THE PROVIDENT INVESTMENT BUREAU. ON WRIT OP CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 290. Argued May 5, 6, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. Wheth
Brooks v. Central Sainte Jeanne
BROOKS v. CENTRAL SAINTE JEANNE. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 283. Submitted May 2, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. Whether one is in general service of another or not, if he is rendering the latter a ser
Chicago Dock & Canal Co. v. Fraley
CHICAGO DOCK AND CANAL COMPANY v. FRALEY, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF CLAFFY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 286. Argued May 2, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. Police legislation cannot be judged by abstract or theoretical co
Wood v. Chesborough
WOOD v. CHESBOROUGH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 257. Argued April 24, 25, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. If the judgment of the state court rests on Federal and non-Federal grounds, and the latter be sufficient
Susquehanna Coal Co. v. Mayor of South Amboy
SUSQUEHANNA COAL COMPANY v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH AMBOY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 301. Argued May 6, 7, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. Where the trade in an- articl
In re Spencer
MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SPENCER, EX PARTE. MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SCHOLL, EX PARTE. MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF MOYER, EX PARTE. MOTIONS FOB LEAVE TO FILE APPLICATIONS FOB WBITS OF HABEAS COBPÜS. Nos. 16, 17, 18, Original. Argue
William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. International Curtiss Marine Turbine Co.
WILLIAM CRAMP & SONS SHIP & ENGINE BUILDING COMPANY v. INTERNATIONAL CURTISS MARINE TURBINE COMPANY. PETITION FOR CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 1032. Petition for writ of certiorari submitted April 14
Merchants National Bank v. Sexton
MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK AND BANQUE COMMERCIALS DE BALE v. SEXTON, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF KESSLER & COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 287. Argued May 2, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. Th
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.