Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1917 Cases
256 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Layton
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. v. LAYTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP GEORGIA. No. 840. Argued April 11, 1917. — Decided April 30, 1917. The Georgia Employers’ Liability Act, Georgia Code of 1911, § 2783, elim
United States v. Morehead
UNITED STATES v. MOREHEAD. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA. No. 685. Argued March 14, 1917. — Decided April 30, 1917. A charge of perjury may be based upon a valid regulation of the Land Departme
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Starbird
ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. STARBIRD, ADMINISTRATOR OF MILLER. STARBIRD, ADMINISTRATOR OF MILLER, v. ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. Nos. 2
Lott v. Pittman
LOTT v. PITTMAN, SHERIFF OF WARE COUNTY, GEORGIA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT. OF GEORGIA. No. 894. Submitted April 13, 1917. — Decided April 30, 1917. A writ of error to review a sentence o
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Carr
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. CARR ET AL., PARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS AS ISAAC W. CARR & COMPANY. error to the supreme court op the state op new JERSEY. No. 578. Argued April 9, 10, 1917. — Decided April 30, 1917. Decided on authority of P
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Olivit Bros.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. OLIVIT BROTHERS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. No. 577. Argued April 9, 10, 1917 — Decided April 30, 1917. In an action against an interstate carrier for damage to goods shipped on a
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Lorick
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY v. LORICK. ERROR. TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 762. Argued April 10, 1917. Decided April 23, 1917. In an action in a state court under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, it was in evi
United States v. Davis
UNITED STATES v. DAVIS. error to the district court of the united states for THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 621. Submitted April 11, 1917. Decided April 23, 1917. When the trial court besides holding the indictment defective for not following
Hendersonville Light & Power Co. v. Blue Ridge Interurban Railway Co.
HENDERSONVILLE LIGHT & POWER COMPANY ET AL. v. BLUE RIDGE INTERURBAN RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 497. Argued April 10, 1917. — Decided April 23, 1917. Where the answer in a state condemnat
Oregon & California Railroad v. United States
OREGON & CALIFORNIA RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ON CERTIFICATE FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 492. Argued March 8, 9, 1917. — Decided April 23, 1917. The Oregon-California Railro
Marshall v. Gordon
MARSHALL v. GORDON, SERGEANT-AT-ARMS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 606. Argued December 11, 12, 1916. — Decided April 23,
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Travelers Insurance Machine Co.
No. 946. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Appellant, v. Travelers Insurance Machine Company. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Arizona. Argued April 11, 1917. Decided April 16, 1917. Mr. Willi
Harper v. Board of County Commissioners
No. 422. Hathaway Harper, Plaintiff in Error, v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma, et al. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Motion to dismiss submitted April 9, 1917. Decided April 16
Gould v. Hyde Park Water Co.
No. 85. Harriet H. Gould and Frederick A. Waldron, Appellants, v. Hyde Park Water Company, First National Bank of Boston, and City of Boston. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. Submitted A
Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.
MOTION PICTURE PATENTS COMPANY v. UNIVERSAL FILM MANUFACTURING COMPANY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 715. Argued January 12, 15, 1917. — Decided April 9, 1917. Under the patent law the grant b
Straus v. Victor Talking Machine Co.
STRAUS ET AL., COMPOSING THE FIRM OF R. H. MACY & COMPANY, v. VICTOR TALKING MACHINE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 374. Argued January 12, 1917. — Decided April 9, 1917. The monopoly of use
United States v. Gradwell
UNITED STATES v. GRADWELL ET AL. UNITED STATES v. HAMBLY ET AL. UNITED STATES v. O’TOOLE ET AL. UNITED STATES v. O’TOOLE ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND, ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT O
United States v. Ginsberg
UNITED STATES v. GINSBERG. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 401. Argued March 15, 1917. — Decided April 9, 1917. When several questions are certified under Jud. Code, § 239, and answers to part will
United States v. Rowell
UNITED STATES v. ROWELL ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP OKLAHOMA. No. 63. Argued November 2, 3, 1916. — Decided April 9, 1917. Jn the exercise of its guardian powers over tribal Indians th
United States v. Waller
UNITED STATES v. WALLER ET AL. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 697. Argued March 14, 15, 1917. — Decided April 9, 1917. By force of the Clapp Amendment of 1906-1907, chaps. 3504, 2285, 34 Stat. 353
Pullman Co. v. Knott
THE PULLMAN COMPANY v. KNOTT, AS COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. No. 262. Motion to dismiss submitted March 19, 1917. Decided April 9, 1917. A suit to restrain a state official and hi
Lehigh Valley Railroad v. United States
LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 124. Argued March 23, 1917. — Decided April 9, 1917. Forwarders who under contract with importer
United States v. Kenofskey
UNITED STATES v. KENOFSKEY. ERROR to the district court of the united states for THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 649. Submitted March 16, 1917. — Decided April 9, 1917. A local agent of a life insurance company, whose duty was to ver
Bunting v. State
BUNTING v. STATE OF OREGON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OREGON. No. 38. Argued April 18, 1916; restored to docket for reargument June 12, 1916; reargued January 19, 1917. — Decided April 9, 1917. Section 2 of the General Laws
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.