Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1917 Cases
256 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
New York Central Railroad v. Winfield
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. WINFIELD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT,. APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, ,OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 321. Argued February 29, March 1, 1916; restored to docket for reargument November 13,
Lewis v. United States
LEWIS, EXECUTRIX OF LEWIS, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OE CLAIMS. No. 197. Submitted April 23, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. The clause in the Sundry Civil 'Appropriation Act of March 4, 1909, c. 299, 35 Stat. 945, 987, appropriat
Yankaus v. Feltenstein
YANKAUS v. FELTENSTEIN ET AL. ERROR TO THE CITY COURT OF NEW YORK CITY, STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 407. Argued April 10, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. The rule that an order of the District Court remanding a cause is conclusive of the right to re
United States v. Wildcat
UNITED STATES v. WILDCAT, A MINOR, ET AL. ON CERTIFICATE FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 741. Argued April 11, 12, 13, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. Acting under the enrollment provisions of the
Rowland v. Boyle
ROWLAND ET AL., RAILROAD COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, v. BOYLE, ADMINISTRATOR OF BOYLE, AND THE ST. LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCO RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP ARKANSAS.
Nevada-California-Oregon Railway v. Burrus
NEVADA-CALIFORNIA-OREGON RAILWAY v. BURRUS. ERROR TO THE 'SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEVADA. No. 237. Submitted April 30, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. In an action against a carrier for breach of a contract to furnish an interstate train,
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. Masland
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS POWDER COMPANY ET AL. v. MASLAND ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 210. Argued May 4, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. In a suit to enjoin defendant from using or disclosing sec
West v. Edward Rutledge Timber Co.
WEST v. EDWARD RUTLEDGE TIMBER COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE • NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 276. Argued May 7, 8, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. The Act of March 2, 1899, c. 377, 30 Stat. 993, in providing for conveyanc
United States v. Illinois Central Railroad
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 310. Argued April 13, 16, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. An order of the Interstate Commer
Woodworth v. Chesbrough
WOODWORTH v. CHESBROUGH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 180. Argued April 19, 20, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. Finding a verdict and judgment excessive, tbe Court of Appeals gave . the party who had recovere
Chesbrough v. Woodworth
CHESBROUGH v. WOODWORTH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 179. Argued April 19, 20, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. An action under Rev. Stats., § 5239, against a director of a national bank for damages sustained
Ohio River Contract Co. v. Gordon
OHIO RIVER CONTRACT COMPANY v. GORDON, JUDGE OF THE JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. No. 594. Argued April 9, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. The fact that personal injuries sued for occurred whil
Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Gotschall
MINNEAPOLIS & ST. LOUIS RAILROAD COMPANY v. GOTSCHALL, ADMINISTRATRIX OF GOTSCHALL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. No. 251. Argued April 9, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. Plaintiff’s intestate, a brakeman, was thrown fro
American Express Co. v. United States Horse Shoe Co.
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY v. UNITED STATES HORSE SHOE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 248. Argued April 30, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. Concurrent findings of state trial and appellate courts as to the f
Meisukas v. Greenough Red Ash Coal Co.
MEISUKAS v. GREENOUGH RED ASH COAL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 229. Argued May 2, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. The right to challenge the jurisdiction of the District Co
Toledo Railways & Light Co. v. Hill
TOLEDO RAILWAYS & LIGHT COMPANY v. HILL ET AL., EXECUTORS OF KIRK. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 200. Argued April 23, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. An objection to the jurisdictio
Johnson v. McAdoo
No. 897. H. N. Johnson et al., Appellants, v. William G. McAdoo, Secretary of the United States Treasury Department. Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia^ Motion to affirm submitted April 30, 1917. Decided May 7, 191
Van Dyke v. Geary
VAN DYKE ET AL. v. GEARY ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP ARIZONA. No. 52. Argued March 23, 1917. Decided May 7, 1917. In a
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Texas Packing Co.
GULF, COLORADO & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. TEXAS PACKING COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO THE COURT OP CIVIL APPEALS, THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT, OP THE STATE OP TEXAS. No. 334. Argued December 6, 1916. Decided May 7, 1917. A case involving r
Chicago Life Insurance v. Cherry
CHICAGO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL. v. CHERRY. ERROR TO THE APPELLATE COURT FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 171. Argued April 18, 1917. Decided May 7, 1917. In an action on a sister state judgment a state court may in
The Kronprinzessin Cecilie
THE KRONPRINZESSIN CECILIE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 922. Argued April 16, 17, 1917. Decided May 7, 1917. Upon the facts stated in the opinion, Held, that the master and owners of the German Stea
Ewing v. United States ex rel. Fowler Car Co.
EWING, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, v. UNITED STATES EX REL. FOWLER CAR COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 721. Argued April 17, 1917. Decided May 7, 1917. When an applicant for a patent admits that the
Hiller v. Crenshaw
No. 646. D. M. Hiller and Max Miller et al., Sureties, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Thomas B. Crenshaw, Clerk, W. E. Woolen, Revenue Agent, and John C. McLemore, Clerk. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee. Motion to dismiss s
Park Square Automobile Station v. American Locomotive Co.
No. 140. Park Square Automobile Station, Plaintiff in Error, v. American Locomotive Company. In error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. Argued April 24, 1917. Decided April 30, 1917. Mr. Edwar
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.