Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1918 Cases
299 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Stephens v. United States
No. 813. Donald Stephens, Plaintiff in Error, v. United States. In error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Delaware. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted May 20, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. Mr. Henry Budd for p
Supreme Council v. Behrend
SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE ROYAL ARCANUM v. BEHREND. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP' THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 267. Argued April 25, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. In the absence- of a special provision of law or rule of the association
Philippine Sugar Estates Development Co. v. Government of the Philippine Islands
PHILIPPINE SUGAR ESTATES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LIMITED, v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. ERROR TO AND APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 189. Argued March 13, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. Where, owing .to a m
Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.
CHELENTIS v. LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INCORPORATED. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 657. Argued April 18, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. By the general maritime law, the vessel owner is liable only f
New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. Harris
NEW ORLEANS & NORTHEASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. v. HARRIS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF HARRIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 276. Argued April 30, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. In actions against a railroad for injuries
McCoy v. Union Elevated Railroad
McCOY ET AL., EXECUTORS OF McCOY, v. UNION ELEVATED RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 190. Argued March 14, 15, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. The contract clause relates to legislative, not to ju
Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield
SUNDAY LAKE IRON COMPANY v. TOWNSHIP OF WAKEFIELD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 38. Argued November 9, 1917. Decided June 3, 1918. An unequal tax assessment cannot be held in violation of the equal protection cla
Peabody v. Eisner
PEABODY v. EISNER, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 705. Argued March 4, 5, 6, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. A dividend received by a shareholder after,
Lynch v. Hornby
LYNCH, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA, v. HORNBY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 422. Argued March 4, 5, 6, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. The Income Tax Act of October 3, 19
Southern Pacific Co. v. Lowe
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. LOWE, UNITED STATES COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 452. Argued March 4, 5, 6, 1918.
United States Glue Co. v. Town of Oak Creek
UNITED STATES GLUE COMPANY v. TOWN OF OAK CREEK. ERROR TO THE ’ CIRCUIT COURT OP MILWAUKEE COUNTY, STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 233. Argued March 21, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. A State, in laying a general income tax upon the gains and profits
United States v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.
UNITED STATES v. ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 75. Argued January 15, 16, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. The Act of March 2,1896, c. 39, 29 Stat. 42,
San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. United States
SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES & SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. error and petition for certiorari to the circuit COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 48. Submitted November 12, 1917. Decided June 3, 1918. A judgment of the Circ
Hartranft v. Mullowny
HARTRANFT v. MULLOWNY, JUDGE OF THE POLICE COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT ÓF COLUMBIA. No. 19. Argued February 23, 1916; restored to docket for reargument November 13, 1916; reargued Novembe
Jeferson v. Fink
JEFERSON ET AL. v. FINK ET AL., ADMINISTRATORS OF SEVERS, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 242. Argued March 22, 25, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. The policy and legislation of Congress respecting the descent of
Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of County Commissioners
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, ET AL. APPEAL FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 22. Argued November 15, 1916. Decided Ju
Hammer v. Dagenhart
HAMMER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. DAGENHART ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP NORTH CAROLINA.' No. 704. Argued April 15, 16, 1918. Decided June
Minnesota v. Lane
STATE OF MINNESOTA v. LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. IN EQUITY. No. 20. Original. Motion to dismiss. Argued April 15, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. An act of Congress granted the "undisposed of” lands in certain sections to a State,
Alice State Bank v. Houston Pasture Co.
ALICE STATE BANK ET AL. v. HOUSTON PASTURE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 154. Argued January 24, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. Upon á review by certiorari, the court confines its discussion to
Ex parte Simons
EX PARTE SIMONS, PETITIONER. •PETITION for writ of mandamus. No. 26, Original. Argued December 10, 1917. Rule absolute June 3, 1918. Plaintiff brought an action for damages in two counts against executors, in the District Court in New York,
Lynch v. Turrish
LYNCH, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA, v. TURRISH. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 421. Argued March 4, 5, 6, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. Due to gradual increase in the mar
Looney v. Eastern Texas Railroad
LOONEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. v. EASTERN TEXAS RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 756. Argued April 16, 17, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. In a suit by carriers
Friederichsen v. Renard
FRIEDERICHSEN v. RENARD, EXECUTOR OF RENARD, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 270. Argued April 25, 26, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918. Plaintiff, having been defrauded in an exchange of lands, sued
Union Pacific Railroad v. Laughlin
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. LAUGHLIN. ERROR TO THE KANSAS CITY COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 623. Argued April 18, 1918. Decided May 20, 1918 A state statute giving an attorney a lien on the cause of action or its pro
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.